- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Sen. Claire McCaskill to tackle sex assault at college next
- Judge’s order preserves NSA surveillance records
- Refurbished Pollock masterpiece goes on display
- Iditarod becomes mad dash for Nome
- ‘Burger King baby’ now seeks birth mom on Facebook
- Study: 2 percent of Americans have new hips, knees
- Friend: Pistorius shot gun out car without warning
- States wrestle with developing, restricting drones
- Japan marks 3rd anniversary of tsunami disasters
Dick Heller: Nats’ casualties of woe could be Acta, Bowden
Some years ago, while the nation’s capital still languished in the horsehide wilderness, a misguided soul writing in this space declared that bad baseball was better than no baseball.
Now I’m not so sure.
Actually, describing the Nationals as bad qualifies as massive understatement. How about abysmal, atrocious or dreadful. And maybe all three.
If you disagree - and I doubt that you do - look at the record: 44-82 entering last night’s ho-hum date in Philly. Compared with other woebegone Washington teams, these Gnats rank right down there. Given another devastating injury or two, they might have taken a run at the 40-120 New York Mets of 1962 who set a modern standard for futility.
And there’s no excuse for it, considering the Lerner family’s deep pockets and presumably earnest vows to make this a model franchise. Which means heads are gonna roll after the season mercifully ends Sept. 28. (If you’re scoring at home, that’s only 38 agonizing days and nights ahead.)
Whose cranium will we see careening down South Capitol Street and over the Frederick Douglass Bridge come autumn?
Maybe manager Manny Acta’s?
Maybe general manager Jim Bowden‘s?
My guess is Bowden will depart. In his career with the Cincinnati Reds and the Nats, he has made some good deals and some awful ones. Bowden is something of a loose cannon on the trading front, and what the Nats need is a steady hand like John Schuerholz or Pat Gillick.
In Acta’s case, we haven’t heard much this season about how well he relates to young players or what a brilliant strategist he is. If the Lerners and club president Stan Kasten decide on a change, you can bet they’ll hire a tougher-than-nails type. That’s how it works in baseball. Empathy is great, but only if you’re winning with it.
Upon arrival from Montreal in 2005, the Nats delighted and deluded us with that 50-31 first half that landed them atop the National League East. Since then, though, they were 219-312 before last night - a nonwinning percentage of .412 that not even a mother could love.
This season’s .349 pace was the worst for a Washington team since the expansion Senators went 56-106 - a .346 percentage - in 1963. In fact, only seven of 74 previous teams hereabouts have done worse - and only three since 1909.
By now, the Lerners might be wondering why they fought so hard to land the franchise. This has not been a good year for one of Washington’s premier builders. We all know which way the economy has been heading - roughly in the same direction as the ballclub.
Besides, the Nats’ owners are involved in a messy dispute with the District over the payment of $3.5 million in rent for Nationals Park because, the Lerners claim, work on the new facility is incomplete. I don’t know who’s right in this matter, but it doesn’t generate positive publicity.
So far the Nationals, from principal owner Mark Lerner and Kasten on down, have maintained a stolid public front in the face of this year’s on-field calamities. Maybe the Nats ought to borrow Washington Mystics president Sheila Johnson, who tore her equally underachieving troops a new one this week.
One thing for sure: The Nats can’t continue this way if they’re ever to challenge the almighty Redskins for local sporting supremacy. Folks in this town will support a loser only so long, and the ballclub has more than exceeded its honeymoon period.
Earlier this season, teeth were gnashed and garments rent over TV ratings that showed only 9,000 households a game tuned in to the Nats in a metropolitan area of 5.3 million. By now, that number might be down to 900, especially with the Olympics flooding the airwaves. Why watch a team with no chance of playing a meaningful game and little chance of winning?
It’s a shame that our baseball renaissance has come to this. For 33 years, we endured summers without a major league team. Now we seem to be in that sad and sorry position again.
About the Author
- HELLER: Peering into a cracked crystal ball
- HELLER: Jack Pardee a class act during his days in D.C.
- HELLER: Stability is why ACC basketball became a power
- HELLER: Instead of swinging, Eddie Yost just walked away
- HELLER: Not to worry, Nationals' rise is just starting
Latest Blog Entries
By David Keene
Conference showed that the values Reagan cherished still endure
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- President Obama goes 'Between Two Ferns' to pitch Obamacare
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- EDITORIAL: Senate Democrats pointless all-night global warming talkathon
- CPAC 2014: Despite Ben Carson's speech, gay marriage mostly took a back seat at CPAC
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Hard-fought congressional election in Florida is seen as a bellwether
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again