The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > National

Scholar: Visitor center edits Constitution

Exhibit mangles, redefines the power, role of Congress

By Stephen Dinan (Contact) | Tuesday, December 2, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Plenty of critics have accused Congress of forgetting the Constitution from time to time.

But a constitutional scholar who has toured the new Capitol Visitor Center, a monument Congress built to itself that is to be dedicated Tuesday, goes even further, saying exhibits mangle the founding document by claiming constitutional backing for powers that are still very much in dispute.

Heritage Foundation, says the visitor center selectively cuts passages from the Constitution, weighing in on a long-running debate about the scope and limits of federal power by taking the liberal side of that debate, envisioning broad congressional powers that the Founding Fathers never intended.

"I started looking at this stuff, and it's just patently absurd," he said. "The dominant message when you walk though the doors in this exhibit you're hit with is the role of Congress is to fulfill our greatest aspirations. So the message you're teaching these millions of visitors each year is the Constitution really isn't what we thought it was; it's the open-ended thing that's up to Congress to decide what it means."

The top leaders from each party in the House and Senate are expected to host an opening ceremony Tuesday morning for the new center.

The center cost twice its original budget and is four years late in opening, and as the delays and cost overruns have piled up, so has criticism. Some lawmakers have objected to what they say is left out of the exhibits. South Carolina Republican, fought to have the Pledge of Allegiance and the national motto, "In God We Trust," added to the displays.

Mr. Spalding said what was put into the displays is just as problematic as what was left out.

He singled out the display on "Knowledge," which he said selectively cuts the powers granted to Congress by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, reducing the full explanation - "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries" - to an expansive grant: "The Congress shall have Power To ... promote ... useful Arts."

The display says that grant of powers is the basis under which Congress founded the Library of Congress, "promoted public education, supported the arts and sciences, and funded extensive research."

In addition to knowledge, the other aspirations the displays say Congress is charged with helping fulfill are unity, freedom, defense, exploration and the general welfare.

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • A replica of the Capitol stands at the entrance to the new Capitol Visitor Center's exhibition hall. The center, begun with groundbreaking in 2000, opens Tuesday. (Joseph Silverman/The Washington Times)
  • The 580,000-square-foot underground center provides a dignified, comfortable place to assemble before tours of the Capitol. One of its exhibit areas is seen here. (Joseph Silverman/The Washington Times)
  • The Capitol overlooks the entrance to the two-level center, the largest and most expensive addition to the Capitol in its 215-year history. (Joseph Silverman/The Washington Times)

Click the photo to enlarge. « Previous | Next »

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. YON: Girl with no future
  4. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  5. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. Israeli know-how
  8. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  9. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  10. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills

Obama team, Congress divided on TARP

Fed official defends bank's independence

CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Ensign's parents gave mistress's family $96k

EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade

Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill

EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Senate delays climate bill until September

Obama's new role: Compromiser-in-Chief

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.