The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Blogs

Bailout funds face major hurdles

Paulson foes on left, right

By David R. Sands (Contact) | Sunday, December 21, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Under fire from the left and the right, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. has a tough fight and few allies as he seeks congressional approval to top off the tank with the second $350 billion from the federal bailout fund.

Key Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts, complained that the Treasury's $700 Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, has done little to help struggling homeowners even as it has pumped out the first $350 billion to boost the balance sheets of banks and other financial firms.

"Despite Congress' clear intent that TARP be used to stem foreclosures, so far no TARP funds have been used for that purpose," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told a forum in the Democrat's home state of Nevada last week.

At Mrs. Pelosi's instigation, Mr. Frank's committee has started drafting a bill that would strengthen conditions that the next round of TARP funding focus strongly on homeownership. Mr. Frank said a new consensus -- including Mr. Paulson, President-elect Barack Obama and top congressional leaders -- will be required before the second tranche of $350 billion could be approved.

"We need the second $350 billion, but it can only be done if there's an agreement as to how to do it," he told Bloomberg News in an interview.

For their part, Republicans and many conservative critics slammed the administration's decision last week to use the bailout fund to help Detroit's struggling carmakers -- the first time the rescue kitty was tapped to help a nonfinancial firm.

Adding to their anger is the fact that the auto bailout closely tracks a plan that Senate Republicans united to block earlier this month, after failing to reach a deal for new concessions from the United Auto Workers in exchange for taxpayer aid. That bill would have used money from an existing Department of Energy loan program, not TARP money, to bail out Detroit.

"I am deeply troubled by the precedent set by expanding the TARP into areas beyond its original intent," said Rep. Paul Ryan, Wisconsin Republican.

"Allowing the Big Three to access funds from the financial-rescue package creates a dangerous precedent for other corporations to lay claim to TARP funds," he said.

Announcing plans Friday to lend up to $17.4 billion in taxpayer funds to struggling U.S. automakers General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, Mr. Paulson revealed that the Bush administration had already burned through the first $350 billion approved by Congress in October.

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is shown here in early February 2009 speaking about the Treasury Department's financial bailout bill.  On Feb. 25, 2009, he said that the omnibus spending bill that passed that day was merely "a first step" in repairing President George W. Bush's policies.
  • AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES PHOTOGRAPHS
Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. says that Congress "will need to release the remainder of the TARP [funds] to support financial-market stability." Mr. Paulson has resisted an FDIC homeowner-relief proposal.

Click the photo to enlarge. « Previous | Next »

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  8. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. YON: Girl with no future

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

    Market Data

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.