The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Suicide pact

  • World

    Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks

  • Culture

    DESIGN: Exhibits traces decades-old fashion, fabric trends

  • Investigation

    Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

  • World

    Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

  • Politics

    ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak

  • Politics

    Republican governors: 'Opt out' unworkable

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Outlet eyed near Civil War battlefield

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Historians up in arms

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Wal-Mart wants to build a supercenter on a roughly 50-acre site near the Civil War's Wilderness Battlefield (pictured above) in Orange County, Va. The proposal involves a location not within National Park Service boundaries. (Joseph Silverman/The Washington Times)

More Editor Favorites Stories

  • Suicide pact
  • Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks
  • DESIGN: Exhibits traces decades-old fashion, fabric trends
  • Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

By Gary Emerling

It's the Battle of Bookworms vs. the Big Box.

Preservationists and prominent historians are waging a dogged campaign against a proposed 138,000-square-foot Wal-Mart supercenter next to the Civil War's Wilderness Battlefield in Orange County, Va.

"No one has a deeper, more abiding respect for all that this ground symbolizes than the men and women who make it their lives' work to study historic sites and events," said Lee White, executive director of the National Coalition for History. "And clearly, they understand the irreparable damage that this would do to a tangible piece of our history."

The controversy - the latest between battlefield preservationists across the country and those wanting to develop on or next to them - intensified this month when Wal-Mart filed a formal application with Orange County to build the supercenter on a roughly 50-acre site.

The request prompted a letter signed by 253 historians asking the Arkansas-based corporation to "respect our great nation's history and move your store farther away from this historic site and National Park."

The historians - which include Emmy-winning documentarian Ken Burns, Pulitzer Prize-winning authors David M. McCullough and James McPherson, and college professors - say the store would lead to increased traffic and development that would "spoil the battlefield."

They also say only 20 percent of the battlefield is protected by the National Park Service, and building the supercenter would undermine efforts to preserve more of the land.

"This wilderness is an indelible part of our history, its very ground hallowed by the American blood spilled there, and it cannot be moved," says the letter, addressed to Wal-Mart President and Chief Executive Officer Lee Scott and coordinated by the Wilderness Battlefield Coalition. "Surely Wal-Mart can identify a site that would meet its needs without changing the very character of the battlefield."

Wal-Mart's proposal involves a location not within National Park Service boundaries, but within the historical boundary of the battlefield, said officials with Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park.

In Western Maryland, developers want to put up a 120-foot-tall cell phone tower at the site of the Battle of Antietam, according to a report in March by the Civil War Preservation Trust.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  2. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes

Most Shared

  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
  4. Faint Shroud of Turin text proves artifact real, book says
  5. EDITORIAL: Chicago, Afghan-style
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Socialist or vast expansion?
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  5. Bowing to 'world opinion'

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. Dems up pressure on health bill's holdouts
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  4. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%
  5. Unforeseen climate 'crisis'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rookie Williams hurts ankle

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.