Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Gitmo cases will be tried chronologically

Associated Press
Shayana Kadidal, a lead attorney among about 200 representing Guantanamo detainees, complains of "excessive delay" by the Justice Department in submitting evidence against their clients.Associated Press Shayana Kadidal, a lead attorney among about 200 representing Guantanamo detainees, complains of “excessive delay” by the Justice Department in submitting evidence against their clients.

A federal judge said Tuesday that those Guantanamo detainees who have been held the longest likely will be the first to have their cases heard in U.S. District Court, depending on security concerns and their health.

“It’s logical to me to go on a first in, first out basis,” Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan said during a hearing Tuesday.

Still unresolved is whether any of roughly 200 detainees will be brought in person to the District of Columbia for the hearings to determine whether the military can continue to imprison them at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Judge Hogan said he plans to decide by Thursday or Friday how quickly the Bush administration must submit evidence against the detainees to defense attorneys. The evidence would determine when their cases are heard.

Some of the detainees have been held since 2002 without trial. Their only legal proceedings have been military tribunals that, their attorneys say, might have included evidence coerced through aggressive interrogation techniques.

Justice Department attorneys said one in five detainees at Guantanamo already is cleared for release, and that they are looking for a country where 54 prisoners could be sent.

Tuesday’s hearing was the first time attorneys for the detainees were allowed to represent habeas corpus rights of their clients in court. Habeas corpus refers to the legal right of prisoners to challenge their detention.

The Supreme Court ruled last month that the detainees must be given hearings, despite a Bush administration policy that denied them a right for their cases to be heard in U.S. civilian courts.

The hearing handled administrative issues required before court appearances of the detainees, such as schedules; orders for transferring prisoners; and whether some of the detainees’s cases can be consolidated into a single procedure.

Judge Hogan ordered that 17 Uighur detainees associated with the East Turkistan Islamic Movement - which the military links to al Qaeda and the Taliban - should have their cases consolidated.

Their cases are so closely “tied together by nationality and political beliefs” that they do not need separate hearings, Judge Hogan said.

He told Justice Department attorneys to sideline their regular caseload to make the Guantanamo hearings a top priority.

“The time has come to move this issue forward,” Judge Hogan said.

Shayana Kadidal, attorney for the Guantanamo Global Justice Initiative, said security will be a concern in determining whether detainees are transferred to Washington for hearings.

“I would imagine that the most likely outcome will be videoconferencing,” Mr. Kadidal said. “But that will vary depending on circumstances.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now