- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Times reporter cites 1st Amendment rights
Question of the Day
Washington Times national security reporter Bill Gertz told a federal court Tuesday that protecting the confidentiality of his sources was “absolutely essential” to his future ability to do his job and that being forced to divulge the people he talked to concerning a Chinese espionage case would infringe on his First Amendment rights.
U.S. District Court Judge Cormac J. Carney has ordered Mr. Gertz to appear at 9 a.m. PDT Thursday in his Santa Ana, Calif., courtroom, seeking to compel the reporter to answer questions about a May 16, 2006, article published in The Times about the Chinese espionage case, which cited unnamed sources.
“The provision of any additional information about the source(s), the circumstances under which the information was provided, or the development of the May 16, 2006 article, would surrender the very protection that the First Amendment and the Reporter’s Privilege are intended to guarantee,” Mr. Gertz stated in a declaration filed Tuesday by his attorneys with the court.
The impending court appearance comes as protection for reporters who use confidential sources has become a priority on Capitol Hill.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced Tuesday that the Senate will consider S. 2035, the Free Flow of Information Act, which would provide a federal privilege for reporters to “protect and encourage” information-sharing between journalists and sources and to secure the public´s “right to know.”
Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, wants lawmakers to address the bill before the August recess.
The House approved a similar measure 398-21 in October. The bill is supported by both presumptive presidential nominees, Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Barack Obama, Illinois Democrat.
The federal “shield law” also has been lauded by industry groups, according to a joint statement issued Tuesday by the Newspaper Association of America, the National Association of Broadcasters and 50 other news or media organizations that have purchased advocacy ads in several congressional publications to make their point.
In a declaration, Mr. Gertz stated that in the past 23 years, he frequently has relied upon confidential sources “to provide information necessary to the reporter’s function of keeping the public informed of events of national interest.”
“Without the information provided by confidential sources, these events - or important aspects of these events - would remain shielded from public and congressional scrutiny and oversight.”
Such sources, particularly government officials, will not share “sensitive, closely held information” without absolute confidentiality and trust, the declaration states.
“Protecting the identities of my confidential sources is absolutely essential to my ability to do my job,” Mr. Gertz wrote, noting that if disclosing such sources were to become commonplace, it would have a chilling effect on other potential sources and the “quantity and quality of investigative reporting and critical analysis would decline.”
In his 2006 story, Mr. Gertz quoted unnamed government officials as saying that senior Justice Department officials approved an indictment against Chi Mak, an engineer who worked for Power Paragon, an American defense contractor, charging him with conspiracy and “unlawful export of defense articles.”
Three of his relatives would also be charged, the story said.
Defense attorneys in the case objected to Mr. Gertz’s account, asserting that the government violated the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), which bars federal officials from giving information about grand jury proceedings to outsiders.
About the Author
- Inside the Beltway: Republican posse rides out to fire Harry Reid
- Third time the charm? Americans wish certain presidents had stayed beyond two terms
- The border crisis could prove a 'big boost' for Republicans as the midterms approach
- Inside the Beltway: Just a little media protection for the White House
- Some federal help for old American battlefields: $1.3 million to spruce them up
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
There's nothing centrist about the senior senator from Virginia
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq