The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Energy

Court revives toll road transfer suit

By Larry O'Dell | Saturday, June 7, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

RICHMOND (AP) - The Virginia Supreme Court revived a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state's planned transfer of the Dulles Toll Road to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, saying Friday that a judge improperly ruled state transportation officials were shielded from such claims.

The court unanimously reversed Richmond Circuit Judge Margaret Spencer's decision and sent the case back for trial.

Two Northern Virginia residents claim the transfer would violate the state Constitution because it wasn't approved by the General Assembly. Under a 50-year agreement, the airports authority would operate the road and collect tolls, some of which would be spent on construction of a 23-mile Metrorail extension to Dulles.

"Today's decision ... does not address the core issue of whether the commonwealth may undertake this project," said David Clementson, a spokesman for Attorney General Bob McDonnell. "The commonwealth will now proceed to defend the merits of the law at issue in the Richmond Circuit Court."

Patrick McSweeney, attorney for plaintiffs Patrick Gray and James Nagle, said the ruling has repercussions beyond the Dulles Toll Road case.

"It's important to establish the principle that any person adversely affected by an unconstitutional action can hold the government officials accountable," McSweeney said. "When the Constitution is violated, people ought to have recourse, and the court agreed."

McSweeney's clients assert that under the Constitution, the power to tax – or in this case, collect tolls - is vested in the General Assembly, which may delegate that power only to local or regional governing bodies.

The case is similar to another one in which the Supreme Court ruled the state improperly delegated taxing power to the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, which is not elected by the citizens. That February ruling essentially gutted the General Assembly's 2007 transportation funding plan.

In the Dulles Toll Road case, Gray and Nagle want their toll fees to go toward maintenance of the road rather than be spent on the rail project. They also are concerned that the state will give up control over the amount of the tolls, which range from 50 cents to 75 cents.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  6. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  9. YON: Girl with no future
  10. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.