- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Obama, McCain abandon energy stances
Question of the Day
As voters pay ever-higher gas prices, Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama are fleeing from their previous energy policy stances, with the Republican embracing expanded drilling and the Democrat seeking to punish energy companies he voted to reward just three years ago.
The presidential candidates also traded fire over how to pursue the war on terrorism, with Mr. McCain’s camp accusing Mr. Obama of “a perfect manifestation of a Sept. 10th mind-set” for praising the way the nation treated the 1993 World Trade Center bombing as a law-enforcement matter. Mr. Obama countered that Republicans’ war on terrorism hasn’t produced Osama bin Laden.
“I don’t think they have much standing to suggest they’ve learned a lot of lessons from 9/11,” Mr. Obama told reporters.
Mr. McCain traveled Tuesday to Houston, the nation’s oil capital, to reverse positions and propose an end to the federal ban on expanded offshore drilling. He also took the opportunity to blast Mr. Obama’s call for a windfall profits tax on oil companies, saying it was a solution straight from the 1970s, even though the senator from Arizona was open to such a tax just last month.
“[Senator Obama] wants a windfall profits tax on oil, to go along with the new taxes he also plans for coal and natural gas. If the plan sounds familiar, it’s because that was President Jimmy Carter’s big idea, too, and a lot of good it did us,” Mr. McCain said. “Now, as then, all a windfall profits tax will accomplish is to increase our dependence on foreign oil, and hinder exactly the kind of domestic exploration and production we need.”
Mr. Obama blasted Mr. McCain for going to Texas to “tell a group of Houston oil executives exactly what they wanted to hear.”
“Much like his gas tax gimmick that would leave consumers with pennies in savings, opening our coastlines to offshore drilling would take at least a decade to produce any oil at all, and the effect on gasoline prices would be negligible at best since America only has 3 percent of the world´s oil,” he said.
Mr. Obama this week has been attacking a 2005 energy bill as a symbol of Washington’s counterproductive corporate giveaways, even though he voted for that measure. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, used that vote against Mr. Obama during their heated primary battle, saying in New Hampshire that if you “rail against” tax breaks for big oil but “you voted for Dick Cheney’s energy bill” in 2005, “that´s not change.”
Mr. McCain also voted against the energy bill, calling it “a grab-bag of corporate favors,” and Republicans slammed Mr. Obama in a Web ad Tuesday for hypocrisy on the bill.
The campaigns acknowledge that high gasoline prices have become the dominant issue, and polling shows most Americans are ready for anything that could bring relief.
A Fox 5/The Washington Times/Rasmussen Reports poll released this week found that 53 percent of Americans say the U.S. should start drilling even in protected nature preserves.
That is further than either candidate has been willing to go, though by supporting some new drilling Mr. McCain has topped Mr. Obama in calling for more production.
Democrats balked at the polling, saying it was based on the premise that drilling would lower prices - something Sen. Bill Nelson, Florida Democrat, disputed.
“Drilling offshore does not lower oil prices,” Mr. Nelson argued. “Drilling is not about the price of oil.”
“Of course you’re going to get an answer, ‘Yes,’ to that question. It’snot a real reflection of the general public’s feeling out there,” Mr. Nelson said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Christina Bellantoni is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times in Washington, D.C., a post she took after covering the 2008 Democratic presidential campaigns. She has been with The Times since 2003, covering state and Congressional politics before moving to national political beat for the 2008 campaign. Bellantoni, a San Jose native, graduated from UC Berkeley with ...
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Family removed from Southwest flight over tweet about rude agent, dad says
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- CANNON: With Russia, different airline crash, same results
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq