- Kentucky city called socialist for buying gas station, undercutting competitor fuel prices
- Israel hits five mosques, sports complex in overnight Gaza strikes
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters’ questions on book tour
- EPA tweet baffles: ‘I’m now a C-List celebrity in Kim Kardashian: Hollywood’ iPhone game
- Australian P.M. Abbott: MH17 evidence tampered with on ‘industrial scale’
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez tells Hispanics to vote and ‘punish those’ who oppose amnesty
- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
Gun control in most countries more stringent than in U.S.
Question of the Day
Few countries go as far as the District of Columbia government did in effectively banning handgun ownership, but gun control abroad tends to be far stricter and more intrusive than in the United States.
In Britain, it is a crime to manufacture or import even realistic-looking imitation guns, while in Canada, handguns must be registered and potential buyers must undergo training, a personal-risk assessment and a criminal background check; supply two references; and have their spouses notified before purchase.
“In recent years, the trend in both developed and developing countries has been in the direction of increasing regulation,” researchers Wendy Cukier and Victor W. Sidel wrote in a 2007 survey.
“Most countries require licensing of all firearm purchases and registration of some or all firearms. Import and export controls are virtually universal,” they noted.
The European Union parliament last fall debated new rules to regulate and restrict gun ownership across the 27-nation bloc, including a computerized database of gun purchases and owners, including the model, caliber and serial number of the weapons.
“All European cows are registered Europe-wide, so why not guns if it can save lives?” Gisela Kallenbach, a member of Germany’s Green Party, told the International Herald Tribune during the debate. “Civil liberties can be sacrificed if we can prevent people from being killed.”
But as in the United States, the effectiveness and fairness of gun control laws have sparked fierce debates abroad, with the data serving up some major surprises.
In France, a strong hunters’ lobby has fought restrictions on hunting rifles. Sweden, with one of the lowest homicide rates in Europe, has the second-highest rate of gun ownership in the EU, at 32 firearms per 100 people, trailing only Cyprus.
A survey by the National Rifle Association found there was little correlation between the strictness of handgun regulations and the level of gun-related crime abroad.
Japan has some of the toughest gun ownership laws in the world, while Switzerland requires all males serving the armed forces to store their rifles and ammunition in their homes in case of attack. Yet both have among the world’s lowest rates of gun-related deaths.
Australia adopted tougher gun laws and offered to buy back private guns in the wake of a 1996 incident in which a lone gunman killed 35 people in the state of Western Australia. But a recent survey by the Perth Today newspaper found that Western Australia today has more guns in private hands than in 1999, when the new restrictions were imposed.
In Yemen, the Middle Eastern country that trails only the United States in global surveys of guns per capita, officials earlier this month announced plans to close 12 weapons markets and nearly 300 guns shops in a bid to curb violence and tribal clashes.
Despite the differing gun regulations, many in Western Europe and Japan see U.S. gun ownership rates and gun violence as a clear mark of difference with other industrial countries.
One contributor on the French newspaper Le Figaro’s Web site said Wednesday that the Supreme Court decision will only make the United States even more “incomprehensible” to Europeans.
The United States “is the only society which will go directly from barbarism to decadence without ever passing through civilization,” the poster wrote.
About the Author
Raised in Northern Virginia, David R. Sands received an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He worked as a reporter for several Washington-area business publications before joining The Washington Times.
At The Times, Mr. Sands has covered numerous beats, including international trade, banking, politics ...
- SANDS: Winners take three paths to the top at the 42nd World Chess Open
- SANDS: Ortiz Suarez wins D.C., Smirin wins the World
- SANDS: Fourth time a charm as Troff captures U.S. junior chess title
- SANDS: Campaigning and competing on Capitol Hill
- SANDS: Kasparov, new caucus mark first congressional chess tourney
Latest Blog Entries
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- Humanists seek support from Congress on military chaplains
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Big milestone for Britain's little prince
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq