- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
Nearly a year to the day before he resigned, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales told his prosecutors to pursue the death penalty against a D.C. man accused of running a violent drug gang in Washington known as the "Congress Park Crew."
But after at least four years of investigation, eight months of testimony and eight weeks of deliberations, a federal jury ruled the government couldn't prove there was a criminal conspiracy called the Congress Park Crew, let alone that its purported leader, Antwuan Ball, 37, had committed any murders.
Jurors acquitted Ball in November 2007 on every count of a massive racketeering, drug conspiracy and murder indictment except a $600, half-ounce, hand-to-hand crack-cocaine deal in Southeast Washington seven years ago.
Perhaps thinking his freedom was at hand, Ball cried when the verdicts were read. Indeed, under federal guidelines, he could expect to be released within a few years.
However, federal prosecutors are asking U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts to send Ball to prison for 40 years, basing their request partly on charges that were never filed or conduct the jury either rejected outright or was never asked to consider.
Known as acquitted and uncharged conduct sentencing, the practice is raising a sharp question among legal scholars: Should federal judges dole out tougher sentences based on accusations that jurors rejected or never heard during trial?
"The rules encourage prosecutors to lack humility," said Douglas Berman, an expert on criminal sentencing and a law professor at Ohio State University. "An acquittal should be a humbling experience. My sense is they sometimes view acquittal as an annoyance they have to work around."
















Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
Please login or register to post a comment