The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Kucinich will vote for health care reform

  • Politics

    Obama team takes heat over unemployment

  • Politics

    Obama, Hill wage intelligence turf battle

  • World

    White House urged to end Israel row on settlements

  • Politics

    'Self-executing rule' decried as a 'trick'

  • Environment

    Poll: Fewer people worry about warming

  • Politics

    Senate approves modest earmark cut

Home » News » National

Friday, May 16, 2008

Delay gay marriage, California court urged

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More National Stories

  • Judge refuses to delay Blagojevich trial
  • Detroit to close 57 schools over 2 years
  • FACT CHECK: Premiums would rise under Obama plan
  • Pakistan charges 5 Va. men with terrorism

By

Traditional values groups will ask the California Supreme Court to stay its landmark decision legalizing gay marriage until the voters can weigh in in November, warning of a "chaotic" situation if it is implemented sooner.

The high court's ruling yesterday doesn't take effect for at least 30 days, said Andrew Pugno, campaign director for Protectmarriage.com, a coalition of groups sponsoring a ballot measure on marriage.

"We are going to go to the court within the next two weeks and bring to the court's attention that the marriage amendment that would in essence overrule the court ... is going be on the November ballot," he said. The coalition will ask the high court to stay its decision until after the November vote.

Otherwise, "it would be very chaotic and to no one's benefit to redefine marriage for only four months, or over the summertime," said Mr. Pugno, who is a lawyer. "They would be better off to just let it go to a vote of the people."

Mr. Pugno said his group will prepare its request carefully because "stays are not common."

The marriage amendment will be on the ballot regardless, he said. If it passes, the words of the voter-approved Proposition 22 — "Only the marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" — will be added to the state constitution, even though the high court yesterday declared those same words unconstitutional.

Adding the Proposition 22 marriage definition to the state constitution would overrule the court, because its decision was based on the current constitution, Mr. Pugno added.

"The only thing that can derail an amendment to the state constitution is a federal claim ... and there's none of that in this case," he said.

Gay rights groups, which were elated with the 4-3 court ruling, have pledged to defeat the amendment.

"The California secretary of state has not yet determined if this discriminatory amendment has qualified for the November ballot," a coalition that includes Lambda Legal and the American Civil Liberties Union said in a joint press release.

123Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  5. FITTON: Secret mortgage politics
More Top Stories »
  1. Iran's link to China includes nukes, missiles
  2. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  3. CROWLEY: What Democrats are really saying
  4. White House urged to end Israel row on settlements
  5. EDITORIAL: Mrs. Clinton's hissy fit

Most Commented

  1. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  2. Obama hones final health care pitch
  3. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal
  4. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  5. White House urged to end Israel row on settlements
More Top Stories »
  1. GOP blasts Democrats over health bill tactic
  2. Poll: Fewer people worry about warming
  3. Napolitano shifts policy on border fence
  4. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats
  5. Obama team takes heat over unemployment

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Question of the day

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said voters wouldn't differentiate if Congress OKs the health care bill by using a procedure instead of a traditional vote. Agree or not?

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Former Pa. Rep. Mike Veon in hot water

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.