The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Business

KELLNER: Voice system searches as user speaks to iPhone

By Mark A. Kellner | Monday, November 24, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Somewhere, maybe, James Doohan is smiling. You remember the affable Canadian actor, whose Scotty on "Star Trek" was often talking to the computer, even if (in one film) it was the mouse of an old Apple Mac? Mr. Doohan died in 2005, but his brogue - affected for the part - lives on.

Well, yesterday, I "spoke" to my iPhone - and it found a hotel for me. I did this not by calling 411, but by using Google's updated Google Search software. You talk, it looks stuff up.

That seems simple, so simple that Spock might furrow his brow in scorn, but it really isn't. Anyone familiar with the history (and current state) of voice-recognition software knows that it's not easy going all the time. With a traditional voice program, you have to "train" the software to recognize your own voice and inflections and do so with a lot of vocabulary words. It's been a good while since I've tried this, but it's not easy, and unless injury or incapacity require it, few of us make the effort. It's just a pain.

Which is why saying something such as "hotels, Warrenton, Virginia," into a software program and having it type "hotels, Warrenton, VA," and then find those hotels is a minor miracle. Had I wanted to find lodgings in the place I was then sitting, I could have just said "hotels," and Google Search, using the GPS features of the iPhone, would have determined my location and found whatever I was looking for, or so the makers claim.

The voice feature seems to run only on the iPhone right now, although the location-aware bit is said to run on T-Mobile's G1 "Android" phone, whose software is made by Google, as well as Windows Mobile devices. On these, Google's Web site says, the locating is done either via GPS or knowledge of your nearest cell tower's location. Very nice.

One can only hope it will expand the voice recognition aspect to other platforms, since Google does seem to want to "spread the wealth" to a bunch of computers and operating systems. (Then again, I'm still waiting for the Mac version of Google's Chrome Web browser. Sigh.)

This is notable for more than just the "cool" factor. It's a key evolution in voice recognition software that might render all sorts of things obsolete. One of these is the often-abysmal directory assistance service of AT&T Wireless. Call 411 on an AT&T cellular phone and you might get your number - and you might not. I've even had operators working under the AT&T name tell me they couldn't find the corporate headquarters number for AT&T Wireless. It's pathetic. But if Google Search performs as advertised, it could find those numbers for you; the iPhone operating system would highlight the number on-screen, and you can click-to-dial.

Other applications are myriad. Ironically, as some have noted, you can't yet have this search your own online Google directory of contact, which every Google Mail user has, right? That might come along down the road, and if it does, you suddenly have something truly remarkable.

• E-mail Mark Kellner at mkellner@washingtontimes.com.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Mark Kellner

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  6. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  9. YON: Girl with no future
  10. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.