The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Culture > Automotive

New, smaller cars cost more

By Bill Visnic MOTOR MATTERS | Friday, September 12, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

There's a fairly pronounced change happening in the U.S. auto market, and we already know what's driving it: high fuel prices.

You may, in fact, already be a part of the change if you've "downsized" to a more fuel-efficient - or smaller - set of wheels. But thanks to the cascade of consumer demand for vehicles with better fuel economy, combined with the ballooning cost of raw materials that go into making a new car, "smaller" no longer is necessarily going to mean "cheaper."

In short: look for the cost of small cars, and all new vehicles, really, to increase for several reasons. Here's why:

1. Increased demand.

It's not going to be just about people seeking better fuel economy. In the coming years, there's going to be a flood of so-called "Millennial" (people age 14-29) reaching driving age. Some 11,000 every day, according to research from Ford. These Millennials, many of them buying their first new car, account for 32 percent of the customers for subcompact cars.

Younger people, say Ford researchers, expect a lot of amenities and features that cost money - and aren't necessarily reluctant to go into debt to pay for what they want. So they'll pay more for a small car. That's what Ford's counting on for models like its all-new Fiesta, coming next year.

Much the same is the case for people downsizing from large pickups and SUVs. Those vehicles tend to have lots of premium equipment - all-wheel drive, leather seats, fancy entertainment systems - that downsizers won't want to give up, so they will demand the same kind of pricey features in their small cars. And because even loaded small cars will be considerably less-expensive than a premium truck or SUV, many won't blink at the sticker price.

2. Soaring materials costs.

The prices for steel, plastics (most are petroleum-based), aluminum and rubber have been rising at scary rates. Automakers had been absorbing most of the increase, but with overall new-vehicle sales slowing drastically this year, it's become impossible to avoid passing on some of the increase to buyers.

What's more, according to U.S. auto industry, expect that trend to reverse.

Honda - one of the most successful makers of small cars - bluntly told attendees at a large auto-industry conference last month that there's no doubt the price of new vehicles is going to go up.

3. Fuel-efficiency costs.

Ok, high-priced gasoline probably is here to stay, and so are concerns about global warming, so just about everybody's going to expect better fuel-efficiency from their new cars, trucks and SUVs.

That includes the U.S. government, by the way, which has set in stone a mandate that every automaker's fleet must average 35 miles per gallon by 2020, an increase of about 40 percent compared with today's average fuel economy.

Engineers say it can be done, of course, but vehicles likely will have to become smaller and lighter, essentially like they are in Europe. And getting there is going to require costly new technology like turbochargers and high-pressure fuel-injection for engines and more gears and sophisticated control systems for transmissions.

Increasing fuel efficiency means vehicles will have to get lighter.

And you already know what that means: lighter-weight materials such as advanced steels and composites, aluminum, titanium and magnesium all cost a lot more than conventional steel.

Americans have long been conditioned to think that small things should cost less. But as we strive for improved fuel economy and less impact on the environment that may no longer be the case for the vehicles we drive.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • The upcoming Ford Fiesta goes on sale in the U.S. in 2010. Ford's subcompact will deliver great fuel economy and the premium features the American buyers require.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. Inside the Ring
  3. Senate delays climate bill until September
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  5. YON: Girl with no future

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Karzai asks NATO to explain civilian deaths

'10 Ford Taurus combines style, substance

Embassy Row

Israeli know-how

Taliban eyes new allies

Golf Report

Tremors jar G-8

Polluting nations not on board with G-8

Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status

EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.