Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Failed firms gave big to both parties

Sen., John McCain, left, greets Sen. Barack Obama, during a Sept. 11 forum on national service at Columbia University. (Associated Press)Sen., John McCain, left, greets Sen. Barack Obama, during a Sept. 11 forum on national service at Columbia University. (Associated Press)

Before the government committed billions of taxpayer dollars to rescue troubled corporate giants, executives at those firms were directing millions of dollars in lobbying efforts and campaign donations to the very politicians who now blame Wall Street’s excesses and greed for America’s financial crisis.

The corporate largesse flowed to members of Congress, the political parties, the nominating conventions and the two presidential candidates through the summer, even as many of the companies and their executives were teetering toward collapse.

An analysis by The Washington Times found that both parties cashed in heartily, with Democrats slightly more likely to benefit.

For instance, executives of four companies bailed out by the government — American International Group, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Bear Stearns — donated nearly $2 million to politicians, political action committees and political parties since last year, including nearly $369,000 to the major presidential candidates, according to Federal Election Commission data analyzed by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics (CPR).

They also spent more than $7 million on lobbyists, Senate records show.

Democratic Sen. Barack Obama received $226,611 from employees of the failed companies, compared with $142,575 to Republican Sen. John McCain, the campaign reports showed.

Campaign watchdogs said for years that such donations were made by company executives eager to keep government regulation out of their business and that Americans must now be left wondering whether the largesse influenced the decision to rescue the companies when they failed.

“For years, they were giving money to get Washington out of their business, and now they’re very interested in getting Washington involved,” said Massie Ritch of CPR.

Meanwhile, both campaigns sought to blame the other for the deepening financial crisis.

“Unlike John McCain, who has raised $239,900 from PACs in the financial services and insurance industry, Barack Obama hasn’t accepted a dime from PACs or Washington lobbyists during this campaign,” said Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt.

“Barack Obama has consistently called for stepped-up oversight of our financial markets to prevent the crisis that we face today; John McCain has supported George Bush’s policies that triggered this crisis and Senator Phil Gramm, who was a staunch advocate for the deregulation of the financial services industry, remains an adviser to his campaign,” he said.

But McCain spokesman Ben Porritt said only Mr. McCain will restore confidence in Wall Street.

“In just three short years, Barack Obama took more money from Fannie and Freddie than any other senator except one,” he said. Democratic Sen. Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, chairman of the powerful Senate banking committee, was the leading recipient, campaign records show.

“When crisis in our financial markets was pending Senator McCain urged Congress to act and pushed legislation, while Barack Obama remained silent. Now that Americans are hurting and fears have been realized Barack Obama is still beholden to those who have lined his pockets with campaign cash.”

Financial, insurance and real estate executives, in fact, have been the leading sources of presidential campaign donations in 2008, according to the center. Of the $114.5 million they doled out, $24.8 million went to Mr. Obama and $22.1 million to Mr. McCain. Securities and investment firm employees provide the third-largest source of funds for all candidates for federal office.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • TRAILING: Rick Santorum has won four states but just three delegates so far. Mitt Romney also has won four states but has 73 delegates. He is waging a strong effort to beat Mr. Santorum in Michigan. (Associated Press)

    Victory doesn’t always mean gain in delegates

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Riffs

          Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

          Ad Lib

          Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.

          Culinary Quest

          Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.