- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
Obama backs marriage act repeal
Question of the Day
The Obama administration continued its half-a-loaf approach to gay rights issues Monday by filing documents claiming that federal laws banning same-sex marriage are discriminatory, even as the federal government continues to defend them.
In its nine-page brief, the Justice Department stated that the Obama administration opposes the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act as discriminatory and supports its repeal. Yet the motion also calls for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a gay California couple seeking to overturn the federal marriage law.
“This brief makes clear, however, that my Administration believes that the [Defense of Marriage] Act is discriminatory and should be repealed by Congress,” President Obama said in a statement, noting that the Justice Department “traditionally” files briefs defending the law “when acts of Congress are challenged.”
Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said the department “cannot pick and choose which federal laws it will defend based on any one administration’s policy preferences.”
In this case, the department has an obligation to defend federal laws “as long as reasonable arguments can be made in support of their constitutionality, even if the Department disagrees with a particular statute as a policy matter, as it does here,” according to the brief written by Assistant Attorney General Tony West.
The administration’s halfway stance drew a similarly divided reaction from gay rights groups, which have criticized Mr. Obama for failing to take a more active role on gay issues, notably ending the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.
Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said she appreciated that the Justice Department “has acknowledged that DOMA is a blatantly discriminatory measure and must be repealed,” but wanted to see more from the Democratic administration.
However, she said she and other pro-gay groups “remain disappointed that the Department of Justice continues to defend DOMA and to argue that laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation do not raise serious constitutional issues.”
She still accused the Obama Justice Department of selectivity against gays in applying discrimination law. “We believe that the Justice Department would be unlikely to make that argument in defense of a law that discriminated against women or other minorities,” she said.
The brief’s tone was far more conciliatory than a Justice Department filing in June that compared gay marriage to incestuous and underage relationships. That document ignited an uproar among gay activists, with many threatening to pull their financial support just before a major Democratic Party fundraiser aimed at the gay community.
Monday’s filing steered clear of arguments related to the merits of gay marriage and argued instead that the lawsuit should be dismissed because it lacked jurisdiction and standing.
The motion also specifically rejected the conservative argument contending that gay marriage weakens the family structure necessary for the safe raising of children.
“For these reasons, the United States does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing and is therefore not relying upon such interests to defend DOMA’s constitutionality,” said the brief, citing policies by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association and others.
Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said he was “relieved” to find that the motion dismissed the child-rearing argument, but called on the president to do more than play defense on the marriage law.
“Now the president must take a leadership role in repealing DOMA,” Mr. Solmonese said. “It is not enough to disavow this discriminatory law, and then wait for Congress or the courts to act.”
Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, accused the president of breaking a campaign promise made in his televised interview with California megachurch pastor Rick Warren.
“In a high-profile interview with Rick Warren, Barack Obama convinced millions of Americans he opposed gay marriage,” he said. “We are calling on the president to live up to his campaign commitment.”
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- DIVEST! Oil is the new apartheid on college campuses
- Californians encouraged to get the Christmas gift that gives all year long: Obamacare
- Colorado judge: Bakery owner discriminated against gay couple
- Fast-food protests spur backlash
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House faces press revolt over access to Obama's South Africa flight
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Selfie at heart of Obama fiasco to stay secret
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
NFL junkie Eric Golub reports on his favorite obsession. There is no football offseason. Every February he pretends to care about other sports while sobbing uncontrollably each Sunday until September.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow