- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
- Russian officials press bilateral U.S. trade deal
- Creator of ‘Selfies at Funerals’ blog retires after Obama flub: ‘Our work here is done’
- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
EDITORIAL: The $10 trillion deficit disaster
Question of the Day
"At what point do we run out of money?" President Obama was asked in May. "Well, we are out of money now," he replied. That was when he projected the deficit to be $7 trillion over the next 10 years. Now his administration admits the number likely will reach $9 trillion. We sure are out of money -- and the true deficit number probably is at least another $1 trillion bigger.
The Obama administration's $9 trillion estimate presumes that Congress will pass a carbon-cap bill and receive $640 billion in revenue from carbon taxes. The deficit estimate also assumes passage of legislation that would raise taxes on international businesses by $200 billion. But it is dubious whether either revenue bill will pass, as they both face opposition from some Democrats in the Senate.
The administration's predictions are based on the claim that there somehow will be many large spending cuts in the future. Quite unbelievably, the White House also claims that its proposed government health care will not introduce any new fiscal burdens.
Gone with the wind is Mr. Obama's campaign promise to cut the deficit by cutting government spending. As he said in the third debate, "What I've done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut."
It's rather ripe to recall that Mr. Obama was complaining that the George W. Bush administration was "living beyond our means" when deficits over President Bush's eight years totaled about $3 trillion. And those $3 trillion should not be blamed entirely on Mr. Bush or the Republicans because the largest deficits occurred during the years when the Democrats controlled both the House and Senate.
Divvied up, a $10 trillion deficit comes out to more than $33,000 for every man, woman and child in America. Not everyone pays federal income taxes; when counting only taxpayers, the federal deficit burden is $105,000 per household. This ransom is in addition to normal income taxes.
Eventually, tax rates will be raised to astronomical levels to fill in the deficit hole. Mr. Obama promised change. That's all Americans will have left in their pockets after his presidency.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: This is no bargain
- EDITORIAL: The new payday inequality
- EDITORIAL: Turbulence at 30,000 feet
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's favor factory
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama's pretentious obsession
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Inside the Ring: China targets Global Hawk drone