- Oscar Pistorius vomits during graphic testimony
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford flubs daylight saving time advice: ‘Turn your clocks back’
- Americans don’t support sending U.S. troops to Ukraine
- Florida lawmakers move to wipe corrupt ‘Boss Hogg’ town from map
- N.C. math whiz to unveil secret of March Madness picks
- An appealing offer: Chiquita merges with Fyffes to make world’s largest banana firm
- Amnesty International says Syria guilty of war crimes for food blockade
- Mitch McConnell on beating tea party: ‘We are going to crush them’
- Adam Lanza’s dad: He would’ve killed me ‘in a heartbeat’
- North Korea holds election: 100% turnout, Kim Jong-un gets — 100% of vote
BOOK REVIEW: After panzers became part of war
HITLER’S PANZERS: THE LIGHTNING ATTACKS THAT REVOLUTIONIZED WARFARE
By Dennis Showalter
Berkley Caliber, $25.95, 390 pages
Reviewed by John Weisman
From the days of Frederick the Great, Dennis Showalter writes in “Hitler’s Panzers,” Prussian military theorists realized Prussia “was unlikely to recover from an initial defeat” in battle.
The result, Mr. Showalter concludes, was that “the Germans incorporated a specific mentality emphasizing speed and daring: a war of movement. This involved maneuvering to strike as hard a blow as possible, from a direction as unexpected as possible.”
These days, we call such tactics “shock and awe.” During World War II, they were known as Blitzkrieg - lightning war. The concept involved speed, surprise and violence of action, the integration of close air support and an offense built around highly mobile armored forces striking audacious, devastating blows before the enemy can mount a coherent, cohesive defense.
Panzer warfare came, Mr. Showalter writes, as a result of the drawn-out, stalemate linear trench warfare of World War I. By 1921, a Prussian aristocrat, Gen. Hans von Seeckt, “moved the Germans from Sitz to Blitz” by developing the concept of “fighting outnumbered and winning.”
“The Reichswehr, Seeckt insisted, must dictate the conditions of battle by taking the initiative.” To Seeckt, that initiative revolved around the mobility that tanks had the potential to offer. Indeed, Mr. Showalter writes, “In 1924, Seeckt ordered each unit and garrison to designate an officer responsible for acting as an adviser on tank matters, conducting classes and courses on armored warfare.”
Among the young officers drawn to Seeckt’s theories was a motor-transport battalion lieutenant named Heinz Guderian. He thrived. “In 1927,” Mr. Showalter writes, “freshly promoted to major, he was assigned to the Truppenamt’s Operations Section … to study the development of motor transport for infantry.”
By 1931, Guderian was a lieutenant colonel, and he and his commanding officer, Oswald Lutz, were planning military exercises that employed tanks as “the key weapon on the battlefield.” By the mid-1930s, the “Lutz/Guderian school” as Mr. Showalter calls it, was integrating self-propelled gun mounts to provide fire support for panzer divisions.
Those panzer divisions’ “guiding principle was attack by fire and movement: platoons and individual tanks supporting each other, and in turn supported by motorized infantry, artillery, and engineers - an integrated combat team. … A defeated enemy was to be pursued relentlessly, with every effort made to cut off his retreat and finish him on the spot.”
By 1937, Guderian had written a popular book called “Achtung - Panzer!” that, according to Mr. Showalter, popularized his concept that panzers must be at the “the operational Schwerpunkt - the vital spot” - at the opening of any campaign. Also by 1937, Germany’s air force, the Luftwaffe, was providing close air support to panzer divisions during field exercises.
By the time Adolf Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia, this integration of force came to be known as Blitzkrieg. (In a fascinating aside, Mr. Showalter explains, “Far from being a German concept, blitzkrieg was in fact a term coined in the West, first used in Time magazine and introduced to the German army secondhand. Hitler himself as late as 1942 dismissed it as ‘Italian phraseology.’ ”
In the war’s early campaigns - Poland, France and the Low Countries and the initial invasion of the Soviet Union - the panzer concept, a “combination of tanks, motorized troops, and aircraft could not only break into and break through an enemy front; they could break out, with decisive effect.”
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CURL: Today's GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- As Crimea falls, Obama takes Key Largo golf vacation, Biden hits Virgin Islands
- Russia besieges Crimea as U.S. seeks diplomacy; Putin remains undeterred by Obama's sanctions
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
- Investigators puzzle: How does a 777 jetliner just disappear into thin air?
- Florida lawmakers move to wipe corrupt 'Boss Hogg' town from map
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults