The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Suicide pact

  • World

    Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks

  • Culture

    DESIGN: Exhibits traces decades-old fashion, fabric trends

  • Investigation

    Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

  • World

    Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

  • Politics

    ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak

  • Politics

    Republican governors: 'Opt out' unworkable

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Thursday, February 26, 2009

EDITORIAL: You always hurt the ones you love?

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • GETTY IMAGES
STABILITY: In June 2008, President Bush signed an order requiring federal contractors to use E-Verify. This week, the Democratic-led Congress declined to renew the law.

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  • EDITORIAL: Bureaucrats regulating corporate pay
  • EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  • EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran

By

Illegal aliens seeking employment in the United States were among the winners in the stimulus package passed recently by Congress - and that strikes a blow against the job prospects of American citizens and non-citizens legally authorized to work in this country. This occurs as a byproduct of the failure to reauthorize the E-Verify system, a critical tool used by more and more employers to ensure that each of their workers is authorized to work in the United States.

Operated by the Department of Homeland Security in conjunction with the Social Security Administration, E-Verify is a computer application that enables employers to verify the work-authorization status of newly hired workers. Since 2006 the number of employers using the voluntary E-Verify system has risen almost tenfold to nearly 100,000.

That's not surprising, because the system is 99.5 percent accurate, according to DHS, and it permits employers to verify work eligibility in minimal time (10 minutes or less) and at minimal cost ($419 per year for a federal contractor of 10 employees). These compliance costs compare favorably to the far greater expense and disruption of immigration raids that result in the sudden arrests of illegal workers.

Despite unbecoming opposition from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the House voted last July 31 to reauthorize E-Verify by a vote of 407 to 2. Although, in the Senate, Robert Menendez, New Jersey Democrat and open-borders advocate, put a "hold" on the bill in an unsuccessful attempt to block reauthorizing E-Verify, Congress voted last year to reauthorize the program as an emergency measure through March 6, one week from now.

This year the House voted to attach a four-year reauthorization of E-Verify to the $800 billion-plus stimulus bill, but the Senate rebuffed Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, when he tried to do that in the Senate, and conferees stripped the House language from the legislation. So E-Verify dies next week, barring resurrection.

The real mystery today is what the Obama administration will do.

During last year's presidential campaign, candidate Barack Obama declared his support for E-Verify. But with the election behind him and politically powerful groups like the National Council of La Raza, the ACLU, and the Chamber of Commerce (which should be ashamed of itself) decidedly hostile to anything that smacks of immigration enforcement, President Obama may be having second thoughts. On Jan. 29, the administration "put a hold" until at least May on a rule requiring federal contractors paid with taxpayer dollars to use E-Verify to ensure that their employees were legally authorized to work. And DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has posted on its Web site a "Border Security Directive" that includes a detailed series of questions suggesting that E-Verify is plagued by problems and that the Obama administration may not be very interested in reauthorizing the program. "Is the real intent to study it to death or fix it?", asks Janice Kephart, director of national security policy with the Center for Immigration Studies and a former counsel to the September 11 commission.

These actions, and the administration's failure to prevent the House E-Verify reauthorization language from staying in the stimulus bill, suggest that - at best - the administration isn't terribly interested for now in fighting for a valuable tool for protecting the jobs of people who play by the rules. The big losers will be working-class Americans and foreigners who are legally authorized to work in the United States - the very people the administration claims to be fighting for.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  2. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes

Most Shared

  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
  4. Faint Shroud of Turin text proves artifact real, book says
  5. EDITORIAL: Chicago, Afghan-style
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Socialist or vast expansion?
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  5. Bowing to 'world opinion'

Most Commented

  1. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks
  4. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  5. Dems up pressure on health bill's holdouts
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  3. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  4. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%
  5. Unforeseen climate 'crisis'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rookie Williams hurts ankle

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.