Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

LETTER TO EDITOR: Judicial confirmation

**FILE**Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-West Virginia, a member of the Gang of 14, gets onto an elevator in the US Capitol in Washington. Thursday, November 3, 2005 ( Daniel Rosenbaum / Washington Times )**FILE**Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-West Virginia, a member of the Gang of 14, gets onto an elevator in the US Capitol in Washington. Thursday, November 3, 2005 ( Daniel Rosenbaum / Washington Times )

Lanny J. Davis‘ apparent desire for President-elect Barack Obama’s future judicial nominees to receive up-or-down votes in the full Senate seems strangely at odds with his applause for the actions of the “Gang of 14” (“Advice to Obama,” Nation, Jan. 5).

The backroom deal made by the Gang of 14 prevented a Senate rule change that would have banned filibusters of judicial nominations, a tactic the then-Democratic minority had used extensively and disproportionately against women and minority nominees. I do not recall Mr. Davis standing up against this vicious partisan tactic at the time. His newfound interest in bipartisanship strikes this reader as a tad too convenient.

The Judicial Confirmation Network was founded, in part, to support the principle that every nominee who goes to the full Senate deserves an up-or-down vote. We did not support this principle out of some amorphous notion of “bipartisanship,” but rather, we believe it is the duty of the Senate to perform its constitutional role in the judicial-selection process. The Constitution is quite clear on this role, and nowhere does it require a supermajority for confirmation of the president’s nominees.

If the Senate abides by the historical procedural rules governing the confirmation process, the Judicial Confirmation Network intends to stick to its principles and urge up-or-down votes - even on nominees we may oppose. It would be quite understandable if Republican senators felt otherwise - most have had extensive experience with Democratic promises of reciprocity.

GARY MARX

Executive director

Judicial Confirmation Network

Manassas

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • A bomb specialist examines debris Tuesday in Bangkok where two explosions rocked a neighborhood. An Iranian man injured by a grenade he was carrying also was linked to a blast that ripped part of a roof off a house. (Associated Press)

    U.S. concerned about spike in Iran-Israel ‘shadow war’

    By Guy Taylor - The Washington Times

  • Mabus

    Naming of Navy ships returns to tradition

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Riffs

          Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

          The Tygrrrr Express

          A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.