- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
U.S. seeks to ensure Afghan elections
Question of the Day
Two months before Afghan civilians head to the polls, U.S. military reinforcements have mounted an offensive against a growing Taliban insurgency that is threatening to destabilize the upcoming presidential elections.
Still, clinics, schools and other facilities have refused to let the government set up polling stations out of fear they will be targeted by the Taliban and tribal leaders in the dangerous southern, western and eastern provinces.
The U.S. offensive, launched shortly after 1 a.m. Thursday in the western Helmand province, was the first step in a campaign that aims to strike at the heart of the Afghan Taliban. As 4,000 U.S. Marines debarked from helicopters in the searing hot insurgent-controlled territory, it became apparent that quelling the Taliban’s growth would not be easy.
The offensive - named Operation Khanjar, or Strike of the Sword - led to the death of one Marine, and several others were injured on the first day of the assault. It was the largest military operation in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban government in 2001.
Within hours, the Marines captured the Khanishin district in the province, Agence France-Presse reported.
The U.S. military also announced that suspected Taliban insurgents were believed to have captured an American soldier in eastern Afghanistan. A Taliban commander, Mullah Sangeen, told Reuters news agency by phone that the soldier was taken as a patrol walked out of its base in Paktika province and would only be released when the U.S. military freed Taliban fighters.
The U.S. offensive comes in the middle of the campaign for the Aug. 20 election, in which President Hamid Karzai faces dozens of rivals, chief among them former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah.
“First, at a technical level the preparations are going well, with some glitches,” said a European official who is involved in the election. The official spoke to The Washington Times on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the situation and for security reasons.
“For example, a few days ago the Ministry of Public Health officially refused to allow their clinics to be used as polling stations for fear of disruption of medical services as well as violence and destruction of their premises.”
Afghanistan’s Ministry of Public Health could not be immediately reached for comment due to the time difference and late hour in that country.
The region, which is the largest area of poppy cultivation in Afghanistan, is made up mainly of Pashtun tribes, similar to other areas of the southern and eastern provinces, and plays an important role in getting Mr. Karzai, a Pashtun,re-elected for his second term.
Resentment against U.S. operations has intensified among farmers and locals in the southern and western regions since last summer when The Times first visited the region. A resident of Helmand told The Times by telephone that the increased civilian deaths and uncertainty of international security efforts have led many of the people thereto shift their loyalty to the Taliban.
“Even if [the farmers and locals] didn’t want the Taliban in control they still feel vulnerable,” said Abdul, who spoke on the condition that his last name not be used, for fear of retribution. “They have lost many of their loved ones in air strikes and they don’t trust that international forces will protect them. They turn to Taliban for security.”
However, Afghan, European, U.S. government and military officials told The Times that the current U.S.-led offensive is a necessary measure in curtailing the Taliban’s growing strength and that it is part of the “near term” goal to break apart the various Taliban groups who are threatening violence, in an attempt to disrupt the election.
“In order to have security we have to change the dynamic on the ground,” Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said. “The near-term goal for this offensive is to provide free and fair secure elections in the south, west and eastern provinces.”
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House faces press revolt over access to Obama's South Africa flight
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Selfie at heart of Obama fiasco to stay secret
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
NFL junkie Eric Golub reports on his favorite obsession. There is no football offseason. Every February he pretends to care about other sports while sobbing uncontrollably each Sunday until September.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow