Survey: 16% of flu caregivers fear working amid pandemic

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Jennifer Harper

Skimpy supplies of flu vaccine and public panic are not the only concerns among officials charged with managing a potential pandemic. Some vital caregivers could be no-shows.

Sixteen percent of public health workers - about one in six - said they would not report to work during a pandemic flu emergency regardless of its severity, according to a survey released Friday by researchers at the Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

"Employee response is a critical component of preparedness planning, yet it is often overlooked," said lead author Dr. Daniel Barnett, an assistant professor of environmental health science at the campus.

"By 'public health workers,' we are referring to any and all workers in a local public health department. These would include types of local public health department employees ranging from clinical workers - doctors, nurses - to administrators, to clerical and support staff."

Other recent research revealed even more reluctance. A survey of close to 200,000 union health workers conducted by the AFL-CIO in April found that 42 percent said they would most likely stay home should a pandemic strike; one-third would go to work, and 24 percent were unsure what they would do.

Hospitals and other health facilities "are far from ready" to provide protection for workers, the survey said.

Dr. Barnett said intensely personal perceptions could keep uneasy workers at home.

His findings are based on responses of 1,835 public health workers in three states, gauging their willingness to go to work during a large scale threat, plus their thoughts on the nature of the emergency - and their own role as first responders.

Dr. Barnett found some pronounced, emotionally driven motivations. A sense of public calling still matters.

Workers who felt citizens were in danger, had confidence in their own abilities and felt they could have a "meaningful impact" on the threat were 31 times more likely to respond to work in an emergency than those who felt the threat was low or that their own role had no impact.