- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
NTSB cited Metro car problems in 2006
National Transportation Safety Board officials told Metro officials three years ago the type of subway car involved in Monday’s fatal crash needed to be updated or replaced.
The Red Line train that slammed into another during the Monday-afternoon commute and killed at least nine people was made up of Series 1000 rail cars, which were described in a 2006 NTSB report as “subject to a catastrophic compromise.”
The NTSB also provided a record Tuesday of recommendations about the cars that go back seven years.
In 2002, Metro officials cited a study performed by Booz-Allen and Hamilton Inc. that found enhancing the stability of existing Metrorail cars, including the Series 1000 model, “is neither desirable or practical.”
The study said measures needed to strengthen the car could lead to more severe injuries and that other measures to improve their “crash-worthiness” would be impractical and the cost prohibitive.
The NTSB said in May 2002 that Metro’s position was “reasonable.”
However, an NTSB report on a 2004 Red Line crash that injured 20 said the failure of the underframe end structure on the 1000-series cars “may make them susceptible to ‘telescoping’ and potentially [result in] a catastrophic compromise of the occupant-survival space.”
The NTSB then issued a recommendation that Metro speed up the retirement of the rail cars or retrofit them with better collision protection.
But in 2007, Metro officials said they did not plan to overhaul the cars but instead would replace them with a 7000-series car, and that the older cars were expected to remain in service until late 2014 because the agency was constrained by leases.
“In view of [Metro’s] response to the board’s recommendation, it appears that further dialogue on this issue would prove futile,” NTSB records state.
NTSB member Debbie Hersman said Tuesday the agency recommended in 2006 that such cars be retrofitted or phased out, but Metro has failed to do that.
“The case was closed in an unacceptable status,” she said.
In a February 2008 online chat, Metro General Manager John B. Catoe Jr. said the 1000-series cars had brake problems. He vowed a thorough investigation Monday aimed at preventing such crashes in the future.
About the Author
- EXCLUSIVE: Colombian prisoners strain D.C. Jail
- Dedicated funding lacking to fix Metro
- Metro didn't follow 3 federal safety notices
- NTSB cited Metro car problems in 2006
- Early questions focus on crash warning system
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again