- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
- 68,000 more file for unemployment — in one week
Waziristan battle key in fighting Taliban
Question of the Day
The U.S. military reportedly launched missile attacks this week targeting Mehsud and his allies.
Missiles apparently fired by unmanned aircraft first struck a purported Taliban training center in South Waziristan, then another barrage rained down on a funeral procession for some of those who had been killed, Associated Press reported.
The second attack appeared to be the deadliest U.S. missile attack ever on Pakistani soil, killing an estimated 80 people, according to the AP. Mehsud reportedly escaped.
A U.S. intelligence official for South Asia, who spoke on condition that he not be named because of his work, said the upcoming operation comes amid signs of improvement in Pakistan’s counterinsurgency capability.
The officer cited three reasons for optimism: the size of the Pakistani force involved, a shift in Pakistani public opinion to support the effort and expectations of new tactics adopted by the Pakistani military to “minimize some of the problems that have been associated with past military operations.”
Recent Pakistani military operations in the Swat Valley have been hailed as a success by the Pakistani government and U.S. defense intelligence officials, who concur that the Pakistan military has cleared more than 80 percent of the militants from that region.
The question U.S. officials ask is whether Pakistan can hold areas it seizes from militants, which would mark a shift from past operations where Pakistan’s military would fight, leave an area and the Taliban would return.
That change in strategy is a hopeful sign, defense intelligence officials told reporters at the Pentagon last week. They spoke to reporters on condition that their names not be revealed because of the sensitive nature of their jobs.
Recent terrorist attacks since late May have been attributed to the Taliban retaliation over the government offensive in Swat.
Once the Waziristan offensive begins, Mr. Riedel said the militants will push back hard.
“The Taliban and al Qaeda recognize that they are in a fight for the future of Pakistan,” he said.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Selfie at heart of Obama fiasco to stay secret
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- KIBBE: Another Republican budget surrender
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Lists of top ten movies, songs, funny moments, fashion statements, automobiles, children's names, stupid celebrity moments, first dates, last dates, weddings, and much, much more.
Communities writers read and review current and past books of note. Also, news and views focusing on print and online media.
An objective, analysis-based perspective of D.C. sports as seen through the eyes of lifelong D.C. sports enthusiast, John Heibel.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow