- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
DNA tests help genealogists only so far
Question of the Day
The path to researching one’s family history often used to hit a wall where the paper trail ended. Since the advent of the Internet, though, genealogists have had a virtual world of information available to them without traveling the globe.
More recently, genetic testing has been made available to the masses to more definitively determine where your ancestors came from. A quick swab of a few cheek cells, and one can go back thousands of years, well before there were historical documents.
The process is not without caveats, however. Genetic tests sometimes leave testers more confused than when the process began, particularly in the black community, where records may only go back to the slave trade.
“Testing is only filling in a small segment of the big picture,” says Troy Duster, a sociology professor at New York University. “That’s part of the problem. Some people feel that maybe knowing a little is better than not knowing anything, but it can provide people with a false sense of connection.”
Mr. Duster points out that only some of the ancestors - as few as two of 64 great-great-great-great grandparents - can be identified with current DNA testing. Genetic DNA tests are quick to rule out whether someone belongs to a particular group, but they don’t take into account the entire genetic makeup, Mr. Duster says. Testing only takes into account biology, and not affiliation with certain groups by way of language, culture or other customs, he says.
Genetic DNA testing technology has been around nearly a decade but has gained popularity in the past 18 months as testing kits became increasingly more inexpensive and available. More than a dozen companies now offer such services. Ancestry.com, part of the largest group of online genealogy resources, began offering DNA services in October 2007 and recently lowered the price of its 33-marker paternal lineage test from $149 to $79.
“You don’t have to be a hard-core genealogist to get excited about what DNA can tell you,” says Brett Folkman, Ancestry.com’s vice president of DNA product. “DNA definitely has huge promise as a big breakthrough for genealogy. Stories may or may not be true. DNA can prove or disprove them.”
Here’s how it works: The most popular test is the paternal lineage, which analyzes DNA in the Y chromosome (passed virtually unchanged from father to son). Since this test analyzes paternal contributions, only men can take it. It was this type of testing that recently established that Thomas Jefferson probably had children with his slave, Sally Hemings.
Also available is the mitochondrial DNA test, which reveals a mother’s line. This type of testing recently proved that remains found in Russia in the early 1990s were members of the Romanov royal family, killed in 1918.
Test participants in Ancestry.com’s program, for instance, receive analysis of the ancient group to which their ancestors belonged, a map of the group’s migration pattern, online results that can potentially identify genetic cousins, and access to a large database of potential relatives.
Family Tree DNA, a Houston company that has been offering DNA testing since 2000, has built up a database of more than 200,000 participants. Family Tree DNA tests start at $99. The company works in conjunction with National Geographic, whose Genographic Project has been mapping the migration pattern of humankind since 2005.
Max Blankfeld, vice president for marketing and operations for Family Tree DNA, says its database is not public, but participants sign a release if they want their records included in the database. Most do, because the more people in the database, the greater volume of information will be out there for historians to access.
“In the case of relevant matches, we provide name and e-mail information,” Mr. Blankfeld says. “It is the ultimate social network.
Through DNA testing, Family Tree and other genealogy companies build surname projects. Family Tree has a listing of more than 5,200 surnames, which further aids genealogists in finding common ancestors and discovering new branches of their family tree.
Genealogical testing companies do not provide medical information, Mr. Folkman says. This kind of DNA testing will not tell you if you have the gene for a particular disease. However, it can tell you if you belong to a particular ethnic group - and sometimes certain ethnic groups have a propensity for a particular disease. Genealogical DNA also cannot personally identify someone in the same manner it would be used in a criminal investigation.
About the Author
Karen Goldberg Goff has been a reporter at The Washington Times since 1992. She currently writes feature-length stories on a variety of topics, including family issues, pop culture, health, food and technology. Follow Karen on Twitter.
- Sweet smell of success
- Overbooked parents see little respite over holidays
- Experts debunk December suicide myth
- Having a baby in the fertility maze
- Lovelace's books remain relevant for today's girls
Latest Blog Entries
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- PHILLIPS: Once-in-a-century stupidity
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world