- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
- U.S. Navy admiral ‘receptive’ to giving Chinese counterpart a tour of carrier
- Islamic State orders female genital mutilation for Mosul girls, U.N. says
- Israeli fire hits U.N. facility in Gaza, killing 15
- Obama encourages ICE to stand down, say former border agents
- Pro-Palestinian protesters attack Israeli soccer team in Austria match
- Virginia police: 2 dead after storm at campground
- Ukrainian prime minister announces resignation
- House members question $17 billion VA request
Senate passes omnibus bill
Question of the Day
The first major spending bill of the new Obama administration came stuffed with some old-fashioned pork as a $410 billion omnibus bill covering a slew of federal agencies won final approval Tuesday in the Senate.
The bill to fund the government through the remainder of the fiscal year now goes to President Obama, just a day before a temporary spending law was due to expire. The clash over pork projects and spending levels foreshadowed the battle ahead for Mr. Obama’s $3.55 trillion budget for 2010.
Senate Democrats had to beat back a number of Republican amendments to the bill, as any change would have forced another politically difficult vote in the House of Representatives and possibly killed the bill.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, expressed frustration that the omnibus bill had taken so long to pass.
“I hope we can move on to other things with a little more cooperation,” Mr. Reid said Tuesday.
Among the amendments rejected were measures to effectively ensure continued funding for the District of Columbia’s school-voucher program, an amendment to end the automatic annual pay increase for lawmakers and a provision offered by Sen. John McCain to strip about 9,000 earmarks from the spending bill.
“The first chance to show change [under Mr. Obama] is business as usual in the House and the Senate, and that’s unfortunate,” said Mr. McCain, Arizona Republican, who fiercely criticized earmarks in his presidential race against Mr. Obama last year.
Mr. Obama on Wednesday plans to unveil new rules to restrict the practice of pork-barrel spending on the same day he signs the measure swollen with money for lawmakers’ pet projects. But Congressional Democrats already have staked out the reform territory and are leery of the president encroaching on their control of the purse strings.
“Although it’s not perfect, the president will sign the legislation, but demonstrate for all involved rules moving forward that he thinks can make this process work a little bit better,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.
On the key procedural vote to cut off debate, the Senate voted 62-35 in support of the bill, including eight Republicans. The massive budget then passed quickly on a voice vote.
Congressional Republicans, determined to revive their image as the party of fiscal restraint, hammered the bill’s nearly 9,000 earmarks costing $12.8 billion. About 40 percent of the earmarks, however, were requested by Republicans.
Still, debate over earmarks reinforces Republican criticism that the bill is more of Democrats’ “borrow-and-spend” governing. They say the federal spending spree - a $700 billion Wall Street bailout, a $787 billion economic stimulus and a $410 billion omnibus, all on top of Mr. Obama’s proposed $3.55 trillion budget for fiscal 2010 - is bankrupting the country.
In the Senate, the top 10 sponsors of earmarks in the bill were evenly divided between the two parties, according to data compiled by the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, ranking Republican on the Appropriations Committee, leads the pack with more than $470 million in earmark spending, including money for health care services for the poor, water and sewer projects and university research.
“This is why our Founding Fathers gave Congress the explicit power to direct spending: so that those who are elected by the people, not bureaucrats, decide how funds are spent,” he said.
About the Author
Steven A Miller
- House calls for immigration enforcement in Central America
- John Boehner blasts Obama's 'lack of leadership' on border
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- GOP unrest growing over Obama's border plan
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
Latest Blog Entries
Raised in Northern Virginia, David R. Sands received an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He worked as a reporter for several Washington-area business publications before joining The Washington Times.
At The Times, Mr. Sands has covered numerous beats, including international trade, banking, politics ...
- SANDS: Cadets battle as D.C. summer chess scene heats up
- SANDS: Winners take three paths to the top at the 42nd World Chess Open
- SANDS: Ortiz Suarez wins D.C., Smirin wins the World
- SANDS: Fourth time a charm as Troff captures U.S. junior chess title
- SANDS: Campaigning and competing on Capitol Hill
Latest Blog Entries
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Obama dispatches researchers to border to check on National Guard
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq