- Argentina beats Dutch in shootout to reach World Cup final
- Tanard Jackson suspended indefinitely by NFL — again
- FAA investigating fireworks drone flights
- Pentagon: We’ll give Obama a drone strike with al-Baghdadi’s name on it
- Marine in Mexican custody to get day in court after 101 days
- Senate OKs San Antonio mayor as housing secretary
- NFL star likely fooled by Marine impostor who accepted first-class plane ticket
- Sen. Ted Cruz tweets Obama directions from fundraisers to border towns
- Israel hits key Hamas targets in Gaza offensive
- Ten-year sentence for New Orleans’ Nagin on graft charges
Democrats mull end run for Obama
Question of the Day
“Reconciliation” is proving a divisive word on Capitol Hill, where it could trigger one of the biggest partisan brawls of the year.
Despite growing complaints from Republicans and even some Democrats, the Obama administration and congressional leaders are seriously considering bypassing regular legislative rules to push through some of their top policy priorities, including health care and energy reform, by using the parliamentary maneuver called reconciliation and, by doing so, avoiding Republican stalling tactics.
It may sound like an arcane parliamentary debate, but a decision to add Mr. Obama’s reforms to the final budget bill that emerges from reconciling the House and Senate versions would eliminate the filibuster — the minority Republicans’ most potent tool to influence bills and slow down the Democratic majority.
In practice, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, would need just a simple majority to pass the bill, not the three-fifths supermajority needed to end a filibuster. Democrats have a working majority of 58 seats.
“Oh, I love 51 compared to 60,” Mr. Reid said Thursday when asked if he was considering putting the administration’s energy cap-and-trade bill on the budget reconciliation measure. “We certainly know that it is an alternative.”
Office of Management and Budget chief Peter R. Orszag declined to swear off the reconciliation route when testifying before the Senate Budget Committee last week while saying the Obama administration preferred to use the regular legislative process.
“We have to keep everything on the table,” Mr. Orszag said. “We want to get these important things done this year.”
If it remains on the table, though, Mr. Orszag and Mr. Reid are guaranteeing themselves a nasty fight.
“I really do hope we follow the regular order around here,” said Sen. Mark L. Pryor, a centrist Democrat from Arkansas.
Courtly, soft-spoken Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican, told the Dow Jones News Service there would be “unholy hell unleashed” if the Obama health care package were tacked onto the budget bill.
Mr. Pryor was one of eight Senate Democrats who joined 21 Republican colleagues in a letter last week warning Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, and ranking Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire against using reconciliation to pass energy cap-and-trade legislation.
A bill “so far-reaching should be fully vetted and given appropriate time for debate, something the budget reconciliation process does not allow,” the lawmakers said. “Using this procedure would circumvent normal Senate practice and would be inconsistent with the administration’s stated goals of bipartisanship, cooperation, and openness.”
Among the signers were Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and a slew of centrists Democrats whose votes could prove crucial to Mr. Obama’s agenda, including Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Evan Bayh of Indiana.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Montana Democrat and a critical player in both the health care and energy debates, said Democrats haven’t decided whether to use the budget reconciliation process.
Mr. Baucus said after an address to a business health care forum last week that he would prefer not to go the reconciliation route, saying he still hopes for strong bipartisan support for the measures. He also has downplayed speculation that there is growing pressure from inside his party for reconciliation.
About the Author
Raised in Northern Virginia, David R. Sands received an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He worked as a reporter for several Washington-area business publications before joining The Washington Times.
At The Times, Mr. Sands has covered numerous beats, including international trade, banking, politics ...
- SANDS: Ortiz Suarez wins D.C., Smirin wins the World
- SANDS: Fourth time a charm as Troff captures U.S. junior chess title
- SANDS: Campaigning and competing on Capitol Hill
- SANDS: Kasparov, new caucus mark first congressional chess tourney
- SANDS: Sometimes a chess queen is too powerful for her own good
Latest Blog Entries
By Ted Cruz
Banning speech with a constitutional amendment is playing with fire
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- White House plans for bowling alley upgrades abruptly canceled
- Obama requests $3.7 billion to fight surge of illegals
- Illegal immigrants showing up at border with 'Yes we can' Obama shoes: report
- Power grab: EPA wants to garnish wages of polluters
- EDITORIAL: Whats Obama hiding at illegal-alien 'refugee' camps?
- Islamic militants aim to take Baghdad airport
- Colorado man offers Obama a toke of marijuana a Rocky Mountain 'high'
- Facebook allows 'Kill Kendall Jones' page, but deletes her game hunting photos
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener