- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
- Obama ‘birther’ theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
Case against AIPAC lobbyists dropped
The Justice Department Friday ended the high-profile prosecution of two former pro-Israel lobbyists suspected of having sought and distributed classified information involving Iran and Iraq — a decision that could strengthen the rights of reporters, lobbyists and social activists to obtain and publicize government secrets.
The decision to drop the case against Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, who were dismissed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in 2005, was anticipated for several months. It came after the Justice Department lost a series of pretrial rulings on the classification of the evidence it wanted to bring to court and on the bar the prosecution would have to meet.
Dana J. Boente, acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said in a statement Friday morning, “When this indictment was brought, the government believed it could prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt based on the statute.
“However, as the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit noted, the District Court potentially imposed an additional burden on the prosecution not mandated by statute. Given the diminished likelihood the government will prevail at trial under the additional intent requirements imposed by the court and the inevitable disclosure of classified information that would occur at any trial in this matter, we have asked the court to dismiss the indictment.”
Mr. Rosen, who had been AIPAC’s top strategist on foreign policy issues, expressed relief.
“Of course we are relieved it is over,” he told The Washington Times. “It was an unjust prosecution. But thank God we live in America, where this kind of injustice can be corrected by the courts.”
Mr. Weissman, who had been the lobby’s top expert on Iran, added, “Now I have to figure out what I want to do when I grow up. This has been hanging over me for five years.”
The two purportedly talked to a reporter and an Israeli diplomat about policy options toward Iran then under review by the Bush administration and about threats to Israelis in Iraqi Kurdistan. While the counts fall under the 1917 Espionage Act, the prosecution explicitly stated that the two former AIPAC officials were not considered agents of a foreign power.
The case aroused considerable controversy in Washington because of the Israel lobby’s high profile and the fact that Mr. Rosen and Mr. Weissman were the first private citizens prosecuted under the Espionage Act for mishandling classified information obtained through conversation. The precedent, if upheld, could have made much national-security journalism and foreign-policy lobbying a federal crime.
While some critics of AIPAC saw the indictments as justified because of what critics regard as the group’s undue influence over U.S. foreign policy, several civil liberties groups rallied to the defendants’ cause and said they were prosecuted for doing something that happens in Washington every day.
Steve Aftergood, director of the project on government secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said Friday’s decision “closes the door on an ill-conceived attempt to use the Espionage Act as a means to punish leaks of classified information.”
The original indictment indicated that the FBI asked for and received a special warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to monitor the AIPAC lobbyists, going as far back as at least 1999.
The case has had repercussions for Israeli officials.
Uzi Arad, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was barred from coming to the United States for nearly two years because he was mentioned in the indictment, He was overheard meeting with Lawrence Franklin, a former Pentagon Iran specialist who pleaded guilty to mishandling classified material when he took secret and top-secret documents from his office to his home.
Franklin has been sentenced to 12 years in federal prison, though he has yet to serve any time. Israeli officials confirmed to The Times that Mr. Arad will be traveling to the United States this month as part of Mr. Netanyahu’s delegation when the Israeli prime minister meets with President Obama.
About the Author
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Obama birther theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- North Korea's official report on Jang Song Thaek
- Dr. Ben Carson disavows efforts at presidential draft
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
John Glaser turns his pen toward foreign policy and international relations around the world
A conservative commentator and satirist takes on the worlds of politics and entertainment in pursuit of truth, justice and all things America.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow