- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
COHEN: Peace undivided in Jerusalem?
Question of the Day
Will the decades-long alliance between the United States and Israel fall victim to the Obama administration’s naive quest for instant peace in the Middle East?
President Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are set to meet today. But the White House seems to be engaging in calculated alienation of the Israelis, shutting down communications with Israeli diplomats and media.
For example, when Israeli President Shimon Peres visited Mr. Obama at the White House, senior adviser David Axelrod - not Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton - sat in. Mrs. Clinton, it seems, is “too pro-Israel.” When the meeting ended, there was no press conference for the Nobel-winning Israeli elder statesman.
In another diplomatic slight, Israel is not on the itinerary for the president’s June trip to the Middle East. Mr. Obama will go to Egypt to deliver a major speech to the Muslim world and swing through several other states in the region. Jerusalem doesn’t rate a visit.
Not all moves have been as subtle. In public statements, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and National Security Adviser Gen. James L. Jones appear to have linked U.S. willingness to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program to Israeli willingness to make concessions on the two-state solution.
Such linkage is both immoral and counterproductive. It is immoral because it is dangerously close to extorting concessions with the threat of a nuclear holocaust, which may be initiated by the vitriolic Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is counterproductive because Iranian nukes will threaten not just the Jewish state, but other allies and U.S. interests in the Middle East.
The administration wants Mr. Netanyahu to retreat fully to the June 4, 1967, cease-fire lines, including partition of Jerusalem. A vast majority of Israelis oppose such an untenable scenario. Those lines are widely considered indefensible. The late, dovish Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban called them “the borders of Auschwitz.”
The White House also advocates carving up Jerusalem to make it the Palestinian capital, which never existed before. This would be a nightmare for the generation that witnessed the Berlin Wall falling and freedom soaring.
We should not want Jerusalem cut in half by barbed-wire fences and Jews and Christians barred from their places of worship as they were before 1967.
The Obama administration also wants Israel to join the dangerously ineffective Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The United States committed in a previously signed bilateral agreement not to tamper with the Israeli nuclear shield. This is like demanding a man in a bad neighborhood to trade in his shotgun when the criminal next door is getting a Kalashnikov.
As the White House concentrates on pressuring Israel, its archfoe - the terrorist organization Hamas - is gaining strength. Polls predict Hamas would win Palestinian elections. If Hamastan arises in the West Bank as it did in Gaza, it likely will become the next failed terror state, keenly interested in destabilizing our ally Jordan as well as eliminating Israel.
It’s unfortunate that the administration is spending precious time and political capital trying for a quick fix to an intractable conflict. Mr. Obama and his top officials are meeting with world leaders to develop a solution to the Palestinian problem that can only be imposed on Israeli under massive pressure.
Based on the Saudi “Arab peace plan,” it envisions settling millions of the 1948 Palestinian refugees and their descendants in Israel, attempting to turn Israeli over time into a Muslim state through the use of demography.
Good intentions pave the way to disasters, especially in the Middle East. Consider the Camp David II negotiations. When their instant solution failed, it precipitated Yasser Arafat’s terror war, which killed about 6,000.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy