COHEN: Peace undivided in Jerusalem?

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

COMMENTARY:

Will the decades-long alliance between the United States and Israel fall victim to the Obama administration’s naive quest for instant peace in the Middle East?

President Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are set to meet today. But the White House seems to be engaging in calculated alienation of the Israelis, shutting down communications with Israeli diplomats and media.

For example, when Israeli President Shimon Peres visited Mr. Obama at the White House, senior adviser David Axelrod - not Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton - sat in. Mrs. Clinton, it seems, is “too pro-Israel.” When the meeting ended, there was no press conference for the Nobel-winning Israeli elder statesman.

In another diplomatic slight, Israel is not on the itinerary for the president’s June trip to the Middle East. Mr. Obama will go to Egypt to deliver a major speech to the Muslim world and swing through several other states in the region. Jerusalem doesn’t rate a visit.

Not all moves have been as subtle. In public statements, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and National Security Adviser Gen. James L. Jones appear to have linked U.S. willingness to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program to Israeli willingness to make concessions on the two-state solution.

Such linkage is both immoral and counterproductive. It is immoral because it is dangerously close to extorting concessions with the threat of a nuclear holocaust, which may be initiated by the vitriolic Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is counterproductive because Iranian nukes will threaten not just the Jewish state, but other allies and U.S. interests in the Middle East.

The administration wants Mr. Netanyahu to retreat fully to the June 4, 1967, cease-fire lines, including partition of Jerusalem. A vast majority of Israelis oppose such an untenable scenario. Those lines are widely considered indefensible. The late, dovish Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban called them “the borders of Auschwitz.”

The White House also advocates carving up Jerusalem to make it the Palestinian capital, which never existed before. This would be a nightmare for the generation that witnessed the Berlin Wall falling and freedom soaring.

We should not want Jerusalem cut in half by barbed-wire fences and Jews and Christians barred from their places of worship as they were before 1967.

The Obama administration also wants Israel to join the dangerously ineffective Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The United States committed in a previously signed bilateral agreement not to tamper with the Israeli nuclear shield. This is like demanding a man in a bad neighborhood to trade in his shotgun when the criminal next door is getting a Kalashnikov.

As the White House concentrates on pressuring Israel, its archfoe - the terrorist organization Hamas - is gaining strength. Polls predict Hamas would win Palestinian elections. If Hamastan arises in the West Bank as it did in Gaza, it likely will become the next failed terror state, keenly interested in destabilizing our ally Jordan as well as eliminating Israel.

It’s unfortunate that the administration is spending precious time and political capital trying for a quick fix to an intractable conflict. Mr. Obama and his top officials are meeting with world leaders to develop a solution to the Palestinian problem that can only be imposed on Israeli under massive pressure.

Based on the Saudi “Arab peace plan,” it envisions settling millions of the 1948 Palestinian refugees and their descendants in Israel, attempting to turn Israeli over time into a Muslim state through the use of demography.

Good intentions pave the way to disasters, especially in the Middle East. Consider the Camp David II negotiations. When their instant solution failed, it precipitated Yasser Arafat’s terror war, which killed about 6,000.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts