The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    CURL: West Point is site of historic Vietnam speech

  • Politics

    Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything

  • Food

    Obama pardons 'Courage,' the Thanksgiving turkey

  • Politics

    Obama to outline war plan at West Point

  • Politics

    Obama to attend Denmark climate summit

  • Business

    Initial jobless claims lowest in about year

  • National

    PULLEN: GOP came unmoored in last decade – it hurt

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Twenty years after the fall

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Remembering a new birth of freedom

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • associated press
Berliners celebrate the opening of East-West German borders in 1989.

More Commentary Stories

  • Border barriers lower rates
  • Another government debacle?
  • A safe harbor for our foes
  • Declaring Palestine

By James Goldgeier

Twenty years ago, no one could miss the significance of the fall of the Berlin Wall. On Nov. 9, 1989, the Cold War struggle between the United States and Soviet Union was finally over after 40 years. Unexpectedly, the Soviet Union failed to hold on to its empire in Eastern Europe. Americans began to imagine the benefits of a "peace dividend" now that they seemingly no longer needed to spend quite so much on defense.

But the fall of the Berlin Wall was not the only event of lasting significance that year. In February 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew its remaining troops from Afghanistan, and the United States turned its attention elsewhere, thereby paving the way for the growth of al Qaeda. In June, the Chinese government killed hundreds of its own citizens in Tiananmen Square, making clear that it would not allow its burgeoning capitalist economy to be accompanied by democracy.

Although Americans didn't know it at the time, one challenger - Soviet communism - had given way to two new ones: failed states and illiberal capitalism. While neither has proven as all encompassing as the Soviet threat, each has vexed the United States for the past two decades and will continue to do so in the coming years.

With the Cold War rivalry over, the United States wasn't sure at first why it needed to worry about failed states. When the former Yugoslavia imploded, and violence erupted among the new states that emerged, the United States hoped the Europeans could deal with the turmoil. They couldn't. Meanwhile, the United States decided to lead an international effort to feed starving people in Somalia and to restore the democratically elected government of Haiti. The term "nation-building" entered the American lexicon, but often as a term of derision; aside from the refugees streaming into the country from Haiti, it was hard for most Americans to see the importance of these disparate conflicts.

Then came the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, which spurred the United States to topple the Taliban from power. Al Qaeda fled into Pakistan, drawing the United States deeper and deeper into the tribal conflicts of the region. Now President Obama faces the most challenging decision of his first year: whether to commit more troops to an effort to support the Afghan government in its ongoing battle with the Taliban insurgency or concentrate on finding and eliminating al Qaeda operatives. Or both. The United States has learned the hard way the limits of its nation-building prowess, but fears abound that not fixing Afghanistan's problems will only embolden America's enemies.

No country could be more pleased with the deepening American involvement in Afghanistan and Pakistan than China. In the years after Tiananmen, the Chinese generated economic growth that was the envy of the world. In 2000, presidential candidate George W. Bush challenged the Clinton administration's depiction of Beijing as a "strategic partner." Had the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, not occurred, the Bush administration likely would have concentrated its attention on China's rise and the threat it posed to American dominance.

Instead, the United States followed its war in Afghanistan with its war in Iraq. In the process, the United States became yet even more dependent on Chinese purchases of American Treasury bills.

China, meanwhile, showed the world that capitalism could develop without democracy. Such illiberal capitalism may prove unsustainable in the long run, but China has found favor among autocrats around the world. From Venezuela to Sudan to Iran, China has cut deals with America's adversaries, frustrating U.S. efforts to promote democracy and human rights and to counter proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, we rightly celebrate the victory for freedom that day. It was a day of hope, and a new beginning, particularly for a Europe that has largely fulfilled the vision of becoming whole and free in the two decades since. But as we remember the joy of 1989, we should not forget the year's dark side. Afghanistan's descent into chaos and China's crackdown on human rights continue to cast a shadow that we struggle with today.

James Goldgeier is a co-author of "America Between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11 - The Misunderstood Years between the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Start of the War on Terror" (PublicAffairs, 2008).

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  5. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
More Top Stories »
  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  3. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  4. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  5. List of W.H. state dinner guests

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  3. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  4. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  5. 'Boutique' patients pay for better access to doctors
More Top Stories »
  1. PULLEN: GOP came unmoored in last decade – it hurt
  2. The United Socialist States of America
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
  5. Ego of 'O': It's all about him

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  4. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  5. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  2. Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words
  3. EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points
  4. A-listers, fundraisers at W.H. state dinner
  5. WH: Obama Afghan decision 'within days'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Gray coy about job

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.