- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
Five 9/11 suspects to be tried in NYC
The self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and four of his alleged cohorts will face federal criminal charges in New York, where prosecutors plan to seek death penalties, the Obama administration announced Friday.
“After eight years of delay, those allegedly responsible for the attacks of September the 11th will finally face justice,” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said. “They will be brought to New York - to New York - to answer for their alleged crimes in a courthouse just blocks away from where the Twin Towers once stood.”
Mr. Holder said the decision to prosecute Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the four others - Waleed bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali - in civilian court is part of the ongoing process to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where they are currently being held.
The attorney general also announced that five other Guantanamo detainees, including Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri - the alleged architect of the USS Cole bombing in 2000 - will face trials in military commissions at locations not yet determined in the United States.
There are no immediate plans to bring any of the detainees to the United States. A recently passed law requires the administration to give Congress 45 days’ notice before it can bring a Guantanamo detainee into the country.
In the case of those headed to federal court, prosecutors must present evidence to a grand jury and obtain indictments for each of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. Mr. Holder said they will seek indictments directly related to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of nearly 3,000, and he expects that all five men will be tried together.
The attorney general also said it is likely the defendants will be held in federal prison in Manhattan.
Republican lawmakers and other conservatives, including former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, criticized the move as reckless and dangerous.
Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, said, “Now that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the worst of the worst, and his fellow terrorists are set to be moved to New York, what is the president’s plan to keep Lower Manhattan and all our communities safe?
“Unfortunately, Congress and the American people were never allowed a role in this debate,” Mr. King said. “This is an upsetting pattern for an administration that promised an unprecedented level of transparency.”
Calling the move a return to a “Sept. 10, 2001, criminal justice model,” Mr. Mukasey said during remarks to the conservative Federalist Society that it was “a decision I consider to be not only unwise, but in fact based on a refusal to face the fact that what we are involved with here is a war with people who follow a religiously based ideology that calls on them to kill us.”
Mr. Mukasey said he has serious concerns about whether prosecutors will be able to get some of the evidence gathered against Mohammed and the others admitted into evidence. He also expressed concern that the case could be lost on a technicality if defense attorneys successfully argue that the defendants’ years-long detention is a violation of the Speedy Trial Act.
Several defense attorneys involved in the case declined to say whether they would make such moves, but the executive director of the ACLU said some evidence may not be admissible because it was obtained through torture - Mohammed was waterboarded - and defense attorneys may raise the speedy trial issue.
“These will all be at the heart of what will be the arguments in federal criminal court,” Anthony Romero said. “But it is premature for us to say exactly what is being raised.”
Mr. Holder would not discuss specific challenges that defense attorneys could make, but he dismissed their potential impact on the case, saying he has “access to information that has not been publicly released that gives me great confidence that we will be successful in the prosecution of these cases in federal court.”
About the Author
Ben Conery is a member of the investigative team covering the Supreme Court and legal affairs. Prior to coming to The Washington Times in 2008, Mr. Conery covered criminal justice and legal affairs for daily newspapers in Connecticut and Massachusetts. He was a 2006 recipient of the New England Newspaper Association’s Publick Occurrences Award for a series of articles about ...
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Study: Children fare better in traditional mom-dad families
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.