- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
- Friend of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev found guilty of impeding probe
- Train with MH17 plane crash bodies leaves rebel town in Ukraine
- Half of Colorado voters are OK with Hobby Lobby decision, poll shows
- HIV-killing condom to soon hit shelves in Australia
- Estonia pulls plug on Steven Seagal over praise for Putin
- Lawyer: Pelvic exam pics cost Hopkins $190 million
EDITORIAL: Tort reform savings
Question of the Day
Sen. Max Baucus' health care bill consists of a dog's breakfast of taxes after taxes after more taxes. With so much new pressure being put on taxpayers, you might think senators would jump at the chance to find some savings that could eliminate the need for some of the tax increases. Think again. Too many senators are in the hip pocket of the wealthy plaintiffs' lawyers for them to consider any savings that would diminish the lawyers' jackpots.
On Oct. 9, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that lawsuit reforms could save the government about $54 billion in health care costs over 10 years. Frankly, we have seen savings estimates nearly four times as high, but even $54 billion is nothing to sneeze at. According to CBO analysis, if Congress instituted caps on noneconomic damages ("pain and suffering" awards and the like), it would be able to eliminate a proposed new tax on medical devices that threatens to put some small manufacturers of health products out of business. At $38.6 billion, that proposed new device tax could be blocked, and Congress still would have more than $15 billion left over.
On top of that, Congress could avoid two-thirds of a proposed new tax on manufacturers and importers of branded drugs, which is slated to bring in $22 billion. Of course, for consumers who really need those medicines, that tax is no bargain. It clearly would be added to the prices consumers pay or to the price of the insurance that covers them.
Yet easy cost savings aren't being pursued because trial lawyers are among the biggest donors to congressional Democrats, giving as much as 95 percent of all their donations to the donkey party. Or, as former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said in a town-hall meeting in Reston in August, "When you go to pass a really enormous bill like that, the more stuff you put in it, the more enemies you make, right? And the reason tort reform is not in the bill is because the people who wrote it did not want to take on the trial lawyers in addition to everybody else they were taking on. And that is the plain and simple truth."
The health-system proposals before Congress are more about politics than about good health. That is the plain and simple truth.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Snipers from the left target Hillary
- EDITORIAL: The food police trying to arrest soda, again
- EDITORIAL: Failing dead veterans, too
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Illegals aren't immigrants; they're thieves
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The danger of cowardice on world stage
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
Get Breaking Alerts
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- Rihanna, Dwight Howard delete #FreePalestine tweets
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- Driver who killed teen on bike sues family for $1.3 million
- Bill Maher blames Hamas for Gaza violence: 'Do you really expect the Israelis not to retaliate?'
- HUMPHRIES: 'Hes the Worst President in 70 Years'