- The Washington Times - Monday, October 26, 2009

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan | The sirens blared as a Taliban rocket attack rattled troops across Kandahar Air Field for the second time last week.

Army Sgt. 1st Class Teresa R. Coble and other members of her unit at the base’s media-support center hit the floor, lay flat on the dusty cement and protected their heads with their hands. Later, the unit moved to cement-reinforced bunkers until the all-clear sounded.

While the Obama administration debates whether to send tens of thousands more U.S. troops to Afghanistan and Afghans prepare to vote for president for the second time in four months, some of those already braving rockets and bombs worry that their mission has lost the support of the U.S. public and that their sacrifices - and those of their fallen comrades - have been in vain.

“What about the troops who died giving their lives for this mission?” Sgt. Coble asked as she waited for the rocket alert to finish.

14 Americans killed in 2 helicopter crashes
Baghdad blasts kill 155
EXCLUSIVE: Rental industry hopes to buy influence on Hill

By next August, Sgt. Coble, 27, from Germantown, will have served more than 30 months combined in Iraq and Afghanistan, far from her only child, five-year-old Troy Davis.

“We would not be honoring the lives of the troops who died if we left here without finishing our mission, and many troops are concerned that the American people have forgotten why we came here to begin with,” she said.

“If we left Afghanistan right now, its equivalent to somebody going up to help a rape victim, engaging in a fight to help that rape victim, then giving up because they didnt want to get hurt themselves and allowing that rape to continue,” she said. “Because essentially thats what the Afghan population is: They are victims, and we need to follow through with what we promised.”

Others interviewed by The Times were less supportive of the eight-year war and less certain that adding more U.S. forces would defeat a tenacious and growing Taliban insurgency or reduce corruption in the Afghan government. Several asked not to be named so that they could voice their opinions candidly without retribution from their superiors.

One young soldier, who had arrived at Kandahar Air Field from a forward operating base along the Pakistan-Afghan border, said his unit had suffered a number of casualties.

“I used to believe in what we were doing here,” the soldier said. “I’m not too sure anymore. It’s just we don’t know what the endgame is. We’ve been getting hit hard out here. What are we here to win? I have to believe that what Gen. [Stanley M.] McChrystal is doing is going to work.But who knows how long that will last before someone else decides to change the game plan again? I mean, do the people in Washington even remember we’re here?”

Others said they had difficulty working with some members of the Afghan National Army, which they described as disorganized and in some cases untrustworthy. Gen. McChrystal, the commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, seeks to increase the size and quality of the Afghan army as the mainstay for Afghan security in the future.

“I don’t trust them,” said one U.S. soldier who said he had worked closely with Afghan military personnel during multiple tours in Afghanistan. “They make it impossible for us, and we have to work around it. I understand that we’re trying to aid the Afghans in securing their own country, but we’re up against some of the worst corruption I’ve ever known. It puts our lives in danger.”

In Kabul, Army Maj. Pedro Espinoza said he supported Gen. McChrystal’s plans and believed in the mission despite its difficulties.

“I have hope in what we’re doing here,” Maj. Espinoza said, as he donned armor in preparation for the short ride from International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) headquarters to Kabul airport. “Look, if I didn’t have hope, I wouldn’t be here. I wouldn’t be doing what I’m doing. It’s as simple as that.”

Story Continues →