The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Commentary

    Suicide pact

  • World

    Italian arrests tied to '08 Mumbai attacks

  • Culture

    DESIGN: Exhibits traces decades-old fashion, fabric trends

  • Investigation

    Anglers serve time for black-market rockfish trade

  • World

    Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran

  • Politics

    ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak

  • Politics

    Republican governors: 'Opt out' unworkable

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Pushing the statehood issue

Rate this story

Average 1.80
after 5 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Scheme to arm-twist a two-stage vote

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Commentary Stories

  • Money for phantom jobs
  • EPA in a rush on gases
  • Constitutionally, the next time
  • Tibet thrown under the bus

By K.C. McAlpin

Puerto Ricans are a defiant people. In four elections, they have told supporters of U.S. territorial expansion, "Thanks but no thanks, we don't want to become the 51st state."

But "No" is never an acceptable answer to modern U.S. Manifest Destiny advocates who are determined to push American power deep into the Caribbean, notwithstanding those stubborn Puerto Ricans.

They are well along on their latest scheme to transform the island and its 4 million mostly Spanish-speaking inhabitants into the first Hispanic state. Puerto Rico's pro-statehood delegate to Congress, Democrat Pedro R. Pierluisi, is moving a bill, H.R. 2499, that would make Puerto Ricans vote on the issue of statehood yet again. This time, however, statehood supporters are leaving nothing to chance. They have pulled out all the stops to rig the voting process in favor of statehood.

To understand how and why, it's necessary to review a little Puerto Rican history.

The United States first claimed the Caribbean island as a prize after its victory over Spain in the Spanish-American War in 1898. In 1952, Congress re-created the territory as a democratic, self-governing U.S. commonwealth - recognized internationally with its own seat in the United Nations and the right to compete in the Olympic Games. By the terms of the commonwealth act, Puerto Ricans who move to the United States became U.S. citizens with full voting rights.

Since then, Puerto Ricans have voted to stay a commonwealth in 1967, 1991, 1993 and 1998. Initially when Puerto Ricans were asked to vote on their political status, they were given three options from which to choose: commonwealth, statehood or independence. The problem with that from statehood advocates' view was that Puerto Ricans consistently voted for commonwealth.

So in 1998, Puerto Rico's pro-statehood governor, Pedro Rossello, came up with a new strategy. Instead of just three options, voters would be given five. The plan was to dilute the commonwealth vote and win at least a plurality for statehood. In addition to the three previous choices, two new ones were added to the ballot: something called "independence in free association with the U.S." and the old favorite, "none of the above."

However, the "divide and conquer" strategy failed embarrassingly when Puerto Rico's pro-commonwealth leaders urged their supporters to vote for "none of the above," which won a majority.

Now statehood proponents are trying the opposite tack. Instead of offering too many options, they are limiting voter choices in a desperate attempt to engineer a victory for statehood.

Thus, H.R. 2499 calls for a two-stage plebiscite. In round one, voters will have just two options: the current, i.e. commonwealth, status, or "some other status." The idea is that the 3 percent to 5 percent of voters who traditionally vote for independence will join statehood voters and produce a majority for "some other status."

If that happens, there will be a second round of voting in which voters again will have just two effective options: statehood or some form of independence. Puerto Ricans of all political stripes recognize that they cannot hope to maintain their relatively high standard of living without the subsidies and federal money they receive from Uncle Sam. So, as pro-commonwealth Puerto Rican Sen. Juan Hernandez-Mayoral observes, "with the commonwealth option out of the ballot, statehood is finally, albeit crookedly, assured a victory."

But limiting voters' choices could still fail. Puerto Ricans in the United States are known to lean toward statehood. So, to tip the scales even further, H.R. 2499 gives the millions of U.S. citizens who were born in Puerto Rico the right to vote absentee - an unprecedented franchise that blatantly discriminates against other U.S. citizens.

And just in case Puerto Ricans still don't cooperate, H.R. 2499 stipulates they have to continue voting using the same rigged process every eight years until eternity.

All this manipulation would be amusing were it not for the consequences of making a Spanish-speaking territory our 51st state. Unless Puerto Rico were required to make English the language of its government as a pre-condition for joining the Union, it would permanently divide the United States along linguistic lines, with all the conflicts and costs that would generate.

K.C. McAlpin is executive director of ProEnglish.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate
  2. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  2. 19 gang members face racketeering charges
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  5. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes

Most Shared

  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. PRUDEN: Obama bows, the nation cringes
  4. Faint Shroud of Turin text proves artifact real, book says
  5. EDITORIAL: Chicago, Afghan-style
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Socialist or vast expansion?
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  5. Bowing to 'world opinion'

Most Commented

  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. PRUDEN: The Third World and Obama
  3. Army lacks guidelines to deal with jihadists in ranks
  4. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  5. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
More Top Stories »
  1. Dems up pressure on health bill's holdouts
  2. EDITORIAL: Get ready to bomb Iran
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Taliban chief hides in Pakistan
  4. Obama's approval rating falls below 50%
  5. Unforeseen climate 'crisis'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Rookie Williams hurts ankle

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.