Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

EDITORIAL: Inartful politics

A large poster of Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama, D-IL, is placed outside the polling site at Bertie Backus Middle School where voters cast their votes during rush hour in NE Washington, D.C. on election day. (Astrid Riecken/The Washington Times)
A large poster of Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama, D-IL, is placed outside the polling site at Bertie Backus Middle School where voters cast their votes during rush hour in NE Washington, D.C. on election day. (Astrid Riecken/The Washington Times)

National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landesman owes American taxpayers an explanation.

Last month, a top NEA official gathered artists and arts organizations in a conference call that also included a White House official and clearly asked the arts community to get behind the administration’s agenda, including the current top priority, health care. A mere 48 hours after the request, 21 art organizations led by an arts lobbying organization, Americans for the Arts, released the first of two public statements endorsing health care reform and urging Congress to act.

Such a meeting would be disturbing enough — a grant-maker backed by the White House asking grant recipients to support the administration agenda crosses the line from persuasion to coercion. Artists and arts groups that want funding from the NEA to continue cannot help but feel pressure to comply with the administration’s wishes. That alone is wrong.

Health reform backers get seven-figure grants

However, when you add in the nearly $2 million the NEA handed out to those very arts organizations in the four months before the conference call — including more than $1 million in stimulus funds — it is time to start wondering whether a line has been crossed from merely unethical into the land of special prosecutors. Such an investigation might be the only way to get straight answers.

So far, the administration’s response has been a stonewall. Yosi Sergant, then NEA communications director, denied that the NEA had organized the call or that he even had a copy of invitations to join the call. That was not true. A copy of the e-mail invitation from Mr. Sergant himself through his NEA e-mail account is now available on the Web. After this episode, the NEA communications office no longer responded to phone calls or e-mail.

NEA statements at odds with facts

Days afterward, Mr. Sergant was demoted to some unknown position in the NEA. In announcing the demotion, the NEA’s unattributed statement continued Mr. Sergant’s factual frugality. Among the whoppers: The conference call wasn’t anything special because the NEA “regularly does outreach to various organizations to inform of the work we are doing and the resources available to them.”

But here’s what then NEA Communications Director Sergant said on the conference call: “This is just the beginning. This is the first telephone call of a brand-new conversation. We are just now learning how to really bring this community together to speak with the government, what that looks like legally.”

Unless “change” in the Obama administration includes new meanings for “beginning” and “first” and “brand-new,” then there are slight discrepancies between what Mr. Sergant said in a private phone call and what the NEA claims in public. If life in Washington teaches anything, it is that words said in private are far more likely to be true than words cooked up for public consumption.

The NEA’s statement also claims: “This call was not a means to promote any legislative agenda and any suggestions to that end are simply false.” Mr. Sergant’s private statements again contradict the NEA’s fantasy version of events.

“I would encourage you to pick something, whether it’s health care, education, the environment. … Then my ask [sic] would be to apply your artistic, creativity community’s utilities. Bring them to the table. … Take photos. Take video. Post it on your blogs. Get the word out. Like I said, this is a community that knows how to make a stink. Do it. Do it within your town. Do it nationally. Call on other producers, marketers, publicists, art — you know — artists, people from within our community and get them engaged.”

Those are not words that “inform” or let artists know what “resources are available to them.” Mr. Sergant’s words are a call to action. The meaning of Mr. Sergant’s words can best be found in the actions of the people who heard them. They went out and endorsed health care reform two days later.

Planned from the beginning?

This is no coincidence. In January, former NEA Chairman Bill Ivey, who advised the Obama transition effort on the NEA, said it in plain English: “I worked hard to try to forge a link between the arts agencies and mainstream policy in the West Wing of the White House. … I worked hard to get that done and I think that will happen.” He was right.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Illustration by Alexander Hunter for The Washington Times

    KEENE: Occupiers’ dangerous, desperate last move?

    By David A. Keene - The Washington Times

  • The Washington Times

    TRUMP: No one’s apprentice

    By Donald J. Trump - The Washington Times

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times

    RUSE: Planned Parenthood, Girl Scout cookie monster

    By Cathy Cleaver Ruse - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It

    News For You

    Get free daily emails on topics of interest to you, from breaking news to the day’s top stories. Privacy Policy

    Most Read