- Philadelphia mosque leaders try to sever hand of accused thief
- NAACP: Detroit water shutoffs are racially motivated
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- Big milestone for Britain’s little Prince George who turns 1
- Murphy: Israel must be wary of Hamas using civilian deaths for recruitment
- Royce: Putin recruiting ‘every skinhead and malcontent around Russia’
- Nancy Pelosi is adamant: Congress worked together when Bush was president
- ‘Slender Man’ stabbing victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous veteran
- Kentucky city called socialist for buying gas station, undercutting competitor fuel prices
- Israel hits five mosques, sports complex in overnight Gaza strikes
EDITORIAL: Back door to a public option
Question of the Day
President Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claim that a new government health insurance option would strengthen competition and lower health care costs. If they really believe that theory, it doesn't explain why they are pushing a complete government takeover of the college-loan industry 16 years after federal tuition loans were created to compete with loans by private lenders. The student-loan power grab offers a cautionary tale that is relevant to the health care debate.
This wasteful effort demonstrates how publicly financed alternatives to the private sector can be a slippery slope. It's common practice for government to stick its foot in the door before taking over an industry.
The House approved legislation yesterday that would eliminate the major federal student loan guarantee program. Known as the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program, it insures private lenders against defaults. If approved by the Senate, the bill would make the Federal Direct Loan Program (FDLP) the de facto national student-loan lender using taxpayer dollars.
While the more popular FFEL has its problems, this change means the creation of another entitlement that will gobble up hundreds of billions of dollars in federal spending. Much of this fortune likely will be added to the deficit. Proponents claim that about $80 billion in taxpayer dollars can be saved and used to increase aid to low-income students while paying down the federal deficit. However, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the move ultimately will boost annual federal spending by $293 billion over 10 years, more than wiping out any potential savings.
In 1993, the Clinton administration enacted the FDLP, which was designed to be a student-loan monopoly run by government before congressional Republicans stopped a total takeover. A scaled-down program survived because backers said public loans would stimulate competition and help save money. No surprise, these promises never materialized.
Democrats now want to make good on their original plan, reducing private industry to mere loan servicers. The federalization of student loans could mean the loss of tens of thousands of private-sector jobs as it bloats the bureaucracy at the Department of Education. As Democrats move forward with health care reform, lawmakers would be wise to keep this ruse in mind.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Snipers from the left target Hillary
- EDITORIAL: The food police trying to arrest soda, again
- EDITORIAL: Failing dead veterans, too
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Illegals aren't immigrants; they're thieves
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The danger of cowardice on world stage
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
Get Breaking Alerts
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Obamacare dealt massive setback by federal appeals court
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters' questions on book tour