- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Evolution uses lack of evidence as proof
Question of the Day
Reading “Al Gore’s global warming-crusade shrinks” (Commentary, Wednesday) brought to mind another, even greater fraud: “molecules-to-man” evolution.
This hypothesis is being taught as fact in our nation’s public schools and most of our private schools and universities. That is bad enough, but far worse is that the careers of teachers and professors are at risk if they present any information to the contrary. Academic freedom is nonexistent when it comes to evolution. When evolutionists have no better explanation for the origin of life on Earth than directed panspermia - life could not have occurred spontaneously on Earth so it must have come from another planet - it is evident they are grasping at straws.
Similarly, evolutionists have no credible explanation for the origin of the DNA in the simplest cell. There is no known scientific law whereby matter can give rise to information. Nor does the fossil record support molecules-to-man evolution. When Colin Patterson, formerly of the British Museum of Natural History, was asked why his book “Evolution” contained no photos of transitional fossils, his response was, “If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would have certainly included them.”
This lack of evidence of evolution in the fossil record is so blatant that the late Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould and others came up with “punctuated equilibrium,” a hypothesis that evolution occurred in isolated populations so quickly that there was insufficient time for it to have left any fossil evidence. Lack of evidence becomes evidence? What kind of science is that?
There is an answer that the evolutionary scientific establishment will not accept: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”
As Richard Lewontin, Harvard biology professor, said in 1997: “[M]aterialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a divine foot in the door.”
It’s time that the house of cards of molecules-to-man evolution collapsed.
RONALD M. REESE
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine