GAFFNEY: Friend of the Brotherhood?

Obama’s policies leave Americans wondering

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

A new Pew Center poll says nearly one in five Americans thinks Barack Obama is a Muslim. Perhaps that is because of reports like the one blared on the cover of the Sept. 6 edition of the tabloid the Globe, replete with photos of Mr. Obama in Muslim garb: It found “shocking proof” in a Nile TV interview given earlier this year by Egyptian Foreign Affairs Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, disclosing that “the American president told me in confidence that he is a Muslim.”

A better explanation is that more Americans are taking note of the accumulating series of statements and actions by the president that display favoritism, or worse, toward Muslims. That would be troubling enough; after all, no chief executive is supposed to support one subset of us over others.

Growing numbers of our countrymen may be on to something else about the Obama presidency, however, that is even more alarming: In instance after instance, Mr. Obama seemingly has bent over backward to accommodate not just Muslim-Americans, but a deeply problematic organization - the Muslim Brotherhood (or Ikhwan) - that purports to represent their interests here.

In fact, the Brotherhood seeks to do something most Muslims in this country - and needless to say, the rest of us - do not want: According to the organization’s mission statement, it is waging “a kind of grand jihad eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

One need not believe that the president of the United States has actually embraced this radical goal to be concerned. It is enough that he has repeatedly said and done things that conform to or otherwise advance the Ikhwan’s agenda as articulated by the Brotherhood’s myriad front organizations in the United States.

Consider the following necessarily partial listing of actions - some symbolic, some substantive - that legitimately can be seen by the Muslim Brothers as evidence of our president’s submission (the literal meaning of Islam and the goal of all those who, like the Ikhwan, seek to impose Shariah worldwide):

c Mr. Obama declared in his inaugural address, “The United States is a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and nonbelievers.” The ordering of Muslims before Jews clearly was deliberate because the latter have been and are in the United States in far larger numbers than the former and have played a much more important role in the nation’s history from its founding. Subsequently, he went even further, describing (inaccurately) America as “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”

c In his much-ballyhooed address to the Muslim world delivered in Cairo in June 2009, Mr. Obama not only signaled his determination to “reach out” to followers of Islam. He also committed himself to an initiative - clearing the way for Muslims to “fulfill their zakat (tithing for charity) obligations” - that would have the practical effect of giving Brotherhood operatives (whose representatives he insisted be in the audience) more latitude to engage in material support for terrorism and, thereby, wage their “civilization jihad” in and from America.

c In September 2009, the Obama administration co-sponsored a U.N. Human Rights Council resolution eagerly sought by the Muslim Brotherhood and its friends. The resolution called on member nations to “prohibit and criminalize” speech that offends Islam and its followers. Such an accommodation clearly would violate the Constitution’s First Amendment guarantees of freedom of expression.

c Speaking of the Constitution, the Obama administration is arguing in federal court that the U.S. government’s ownership of AIG, which happens to be the largest purveyor of Shariah-compliant insurance products in the world, does not violate the Establishment Clause’s separation of church and state.

c We recently learned that, according to Mr. Obama, the NASA administrator’s “foremost” priority is to make Muslims feel better about themselves and their history. Job No. 1 is not assuring U.S. supremacy in space or even assured access to it; it’s Muslim outreach and therapy.

c Then, last month, Mr. Obama endorsed the mega-mosque near Ground Zero in a White House Iftar dinner attended by prominent Muslim Brotherhood operatives. Subsequent efforts to distance himself from that stance, in the face of intense criticism from the public and politicians of both parties, has only put into even sharper focus his pandering to this community.

c Now my Center for Security Policy colleague Christine Brim has broken the story of a major new Obama initiative in that vein. In the words of the largest Muslim Brotherhood organization in the country, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), “A phenomenal next step has been made in which government iftars become coupled with workshops to provide resources and benefit the Muslim community. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (DOA) and the [Muslim Brotherhood-associated] Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations (CCMO) have paired the first of such events, scheduled for August 31, 2010.”

The latest poll suggests that most Americans do not believe Barack Obama is a Muslim. For the vast majority of us, it would not matter even if he were - provided he does not subscribe to the Brotherhood’s creed: “God is our objective; the Koran is our law; the Prophet is our leader; jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

Still, the public clearly is increasingly, and rightly, concerned about Mr. Obama’s policies of favoritism and submission toward the worst elements in Islam. Before tax dollars are spent to that end, we need a national debate about such policies and the grave dangers posed by their seeming principal beneficiary: the Muslim Brotherhood.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts