Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

YEATMAN: Secret science from the CIA

The CIA has reactivated a Clinton-era program, code-named MEDEA (Measurements of Earth Data for Environmental Analysis), that allows environmental scientists access to classified intelligence. The CIA’s network of measurement technology on satellites, ships and planes is ideal for spying on America’s enemies, but it also is well-suited for data collection in a number of scientific disciplines, including climatology, ecology and geology. In 1992, at the behest of Vice President Al Gore, the CIA granted security clearances to almost 70 scientists, thereby permitting them access to highly classified intelligence-gathering techniques. The scientists were allowed to study archival data and propose innovative uses of CIA resources for scientific research.

Project MEDEA may seem like a free lunch, or at least free science, but it’s not that simple. The rigors of CIA security coexist uneasily with the principles of science. Fundamental to the process of peer review, itself a keystone in the scientific method, is the uninhibited availability of raw data for evaluation by the scientific community. Think of it as a fact check. Research derivative of the CIA, however, is classified. So MEDEA science comes with a disclaimer - literally. A 1996 paper on desertification, based on research from project MEDEA, was accepted for publication by the journal Global Change Biology, but the editors included a notice that “Limitations on access to the data make it impossible for the journal’s usual review process to assess all aspects of data quality, selection, or interpretation.”

In light of the damage done to the reputation of science by the recent “Climategate” scandals - in which data that should have been made public wasn’t and a group of scientists discussed ways to thwart the peer-review process and intimidate peer-reviewed journals, the scientific community should be wary of depending on research where secrecy antithetical to the openness of science appears to be a requirement.

William Yeatman is an energy policy analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a contributor to Globalwarming.org.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Illustration by Alexander Hunter for The Washington Times

    PRY: If Iran already has the bomb, what then?

    By Peter Vincent Pry - The Washington Times

  • Illustration: Debt cliff by Greg Groesch for The Washington Times

    MILLER: How Obama will waste your money

    By Emily Miller - The Washington Times

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times

    RAHN: Obama has no Plan B

    By Richard W. Rahn - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It

    News For You

    Get free daily emails on topics of interest to you, from breaking news to the day’s top stories. Privacy Policy

    Most Read