Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

BOOK REVIEW: When the many went off the dole

GOVERNMENT IS THE PROBLEM (MEMOIRS OF RONALD REAGAN’S WELFARE REFORMER)

By Robert B. Carleson

American Civil Rights Union, $26,

142 pages

Reviewed by Wes Vernon

Robert B. Carleson is not a household name, yet Carleson affected, in one way or another, every household in America. As former Attorney General Edwin Meese declared at an April 2006 memorial in honor of the then-just-departed Carleson, “If there had been no Bob Carleson, there would have been no President Reagan.”

That tribute, reflecting a consensus among those who viewed Ronald Reagan’s political career from behind the scenes, makes Carleson’s posthumously released memoirs all the more important. The impact of this “quiet giant,” as one obituary put it, was huge.

Carleson’s service at the very center of welfare reform for a quarter-century is recorded in his “Government Is the Problem.” His guiding hand was the chief factor in then-California Gov. Reagan’s successful welfare reforms in the early 1970s. This writer covered Washington hearings on welfare at the time. Reagan’s testimony before the Senate Finance Committee on the issue so impressed that panel’s Chairman Russell B. Long that the Louisiana Democrat asked if he could borrow Carleson’s talent to help the committee in its welfare work. The request was granted.

Reagan’s plan, crafted by Carleson, would end up taking hundreds of thousands of people off the public dole and enable those human beings to get out of the dead-end lives of dependency in which they and their ancestors had been locked for decades. At the same time, the outlays for those who were truly destitute increased.

But getting the program enacted required the typical Reagan persistence, charm and willingness to go over the heads of the Democratic legislators in Sacramento who - in a historic break with tradition - denied the governor permission to address the Legislature to outline his program. That figures. They already had denounced the program before they had had a chance to read it. So the Gipper found another audience: the people who embraced the reform.

There was bipartisan opposition to the Reagan plan - in both Sacramento and Washington. President Nixon’s undersecretary of health, education and welfare was California Republican Jack Veneman, an ally of California Assembly Speaker Robert Moretti, a Democrat

The Nixon administration was promoting its own welfare proposal, the Family Assistance Plan, a guaranteed-income scheme that would have moved welfare from the states to the federal government. It had considerable backing from Republicans on Capitol Hill, but even Lyndon B. Johnson, whose Great Society had grown the already big government to even more behemoth proportions, rejected a similar idea. “Too liberal,” he said. Carleson writes that part of the plan was “a cover for universal eligibility.”

Nixon’s plan failed to pass, thanks largely to Long - and with considerable help from Reagan’s Senate testimony, with Carleson by his side. Nixon, to his credit, later brought Carleson back to Washington to serve in theDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare, predecessor of the Department of Health and Human Services, as U.S. commissioner of welfare. He would later beat back another guaranteed-income program during the presidency of Gerald Ford.

When he left his government position in the Ford administration, Carleson shocked Washington’s “permanent government” - or the “iron triangle,” as Reagan later called it - by accompanying his resignation with a suggestion that his position be abolished as unnecessary. That is an inside-the-Beltway rarity.

When Reagan was elected to the White House, Carleson headed the transition team at Health and Human Services and then became special assistant to the president for policy development. In that capacity, he was able to implement other means of curbing welfare spending while focusing on help for the truly needy, as he had done during the Nixon days.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Illustration by Greg Groesch for The Washington Times

    KNIGHT: Obama’s politics of envy

  • Illustration by Donna Grethen

    EDITORIAL: The Not-So-Free State

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times

    RUSE: Catholic bishops strike back