The rich did indeed get richer under President George W. Bush, but they also paid an ever-larger share of the federal tax burden, according to new numbers compiled by Congress' chief scorekeeper.
After dipping in the early part of the Bush administration, by 2007 the top quintile of earners - the 20 percent who made the most - paid nearly 70 percent of all the taxes that the federal government collected, according to Congressional Budget Office figures. That includes a staggering 86 percent of the income tax being paid by just the top quintile of earners.
By contrast, the bottom 40 percent on average not only pay no income tax, but they siphon money back from the federal government in the form of the Earned Income Tax Credit, a 35-year-old program designed to offset some of what low-income workers pay in Social Security taxes.
The numbers aren't a surprise to those who study the country's financial situation, but the trend raises deep social policy questions: Can a society where the top earners win a far disproportionate amount of the income be stable, and can a democracy survive when those on the lower end get benefits without ever having to pay into the system for them?
"A rule is, 'You should have everybody who is receiving benefits have a stake in paying for those benefits,' so you don't get an unstable democracy, where people vote themselves benefits at somebody else's expense," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director who is now president of the conservative-leaning American Action Forum.
Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said it makes sense that high-income taxpayers are paying more because there was an "income inequality explosion" under Mr. Bush. He said that happened even though tax rates were cut across the board under Mr. Bush.
"Even while their tax rates are going down, they're going to pay a larger share of taxes," he said.
Politicians have increasingly turned to the tax code to deliver social policy, from encouraging children to promoting home buying and subsidizing charitable giving.
But foremost, the federal tax code is also a means of trying to level the playing field so the well-to-do don't get too far out of kilter with those on the low end.
Mr. Marr said the imbalance has grown dramatically in the last several decades, and said that since the previous recession ended in 2002, two-thirds of all the income gains generated in the recovery that lasted until 2007 went to the top 1 percent of the population.
"Just given the explosion of income inequality in the U.S., the tax code is one way to lean against that trend," he said.
Between 2000 and 2007, the top quintile's average pretax income went from $236,500 to $264,700, or a jump of 11.9 percent - nearly twice the rate of increase of any other quintile. But the top quintile was also the only group to see their federal tax burden rise, and by 2007, it was paying the vast majority of all such taxes.
In 2007, the lowest quintile averaged $18,400 in pretax income, the second quintile averaged $42,500, the third quintile $64,500, and the fourth $94,100.
The Bush era saw its ups and downs, though.
In 2000, the top quintile paid 66.6 percent of taxes, a share that dipped to 64.8 percent in 2002 and then rose, peaking at 69.3 percent in 2006 and settling at 68.9 percent in 2007.
The Tax Policy Center earlier this year calculated that 47 percent of households owed no income tax altogether in 2009, kicking off another debate over who should pay.
The center said the percentage of people with no income-tax liability was high last year both because many people saw their incomes drop in the recession, and because government tax benefits were increased under the Recovery Act. If those stimulus measures are allowed to expire, the share of the population that owes federal income tax will increase.
© Copyright 2015 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.