- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
EDITORIAL: Sestak-Romanoff scandal persists
The White House can’t sweep job offers under a rug
Question of the Day
The liberal media may have lost interest in the Obama administration’s sleazy job offers to two potential Senate candidates, but the White House shouldn’t breathe too easily just yet. Republican congressmen and alternative media remain on the hunt for answers, and for justice.
The White House acknowledged dangling potential jobs to Democratic candidates Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania and Andrew Romanoff in Colorado while trying to persuade each to drop primary challenges against the administration’s favored incumbent senators. The White House said it used former President Bill Clinton as an intermediary for the benefit of Pennsylvania’s Arlen Specter. For the sake of Colorado’s Michael Bennet, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina sent an e-mail listing three specific jobs Mr. Romanoff might receive if he would abandon the race.
In both cases, White House counsel Robert F. Bauer said he conducted an internal investigation and blithely assured the world that no laws were broken. How reassuring. Never mind that the various stories of the people involved didn’t always mesh or that a number of legal experts said the offers were illegal “on their face.” And never mind that Mr. Bauer was precisely the wrong person to conduct such an investigation.
“At worst, [Mr. Bauer’s interference] impeded any legitimate Justice Department investigation, harmed the cause of justice and reinforced public disgust with Washington,” wrote William A. Burck and David B. Rivkin Jr., both former Justice Department officials who also served in Republican White House counsel’s offices, in a June 4 column. “The White House counsel is the president’s principal legal adviser, but the role is not independent of the president or the White House,” they informed.
On Friday, Heritage Foundation legal scholars Hans A. von Spakovsky and Charles Stimson chimed in. They noted that Mr. Bauer’s investigation involved deposing nobody under oath and that Mr. Bauer answers directly to one of the men suspected of being involved in the job discussions, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. This is as bad a conflict of interest as can be imagined. The two scholars thus suggest that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has “an ethical and professional duty” to make sure an independent inquiry is conducted.
Enter top Republican House Judiciary Committee members Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas and Rep. James F. Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin. On Friday, they introduced a resolution of inquiry to force the Justice Department to turn over “any and all documents and correspondence relating” to these cases. The committee, by rule, must consider such a resolution within 14 legislative days.
“If the administration has nothing to hide, why not provide Congress with the requested documents and restore integrity to our election process?” Mr. Smith asked. “It’s time for the White House to make good on its promise of transparency and come clean about what other elections administration officials may have sought to influence.” We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.
The great misimpression is that the White House should be ashamed of engaging in tawdry “politics as usual.” That’s too nice to a White House that no longer deserves any benefit of the doubt. Using federal jobs as lures for political action is illegal in most cases, which makes it worse than the “usual” political games. A fuller investigation clearly is warranted.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: A man for 2016
- EDITORIAL: Spies unlike us
- EDITORIAL: Amnesty by another name
- EDITORIAL: Navigating the swindle
- EDITORIAL: Payback time in Wisconsin
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you