- No mas: Principal bans Spanish language in intercom announcement
- Hacking software could put ‘zombie drone army’ in user’s hands
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- 10 whales dead, 41 others stranded in Everglades
- John Boehner faces bipartisan pressure to allow gay-rights vote
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over ‘ill-judged’ comments about Sarah Palin
- Rep. Duncan Hunter: While Obama prays for Iranian change, U.S. should ready its nukes
- Best company ever? Veteran Beer Co. exists to employ vets, provide quality beer
- Iran official: Sanctions ‘utterly failed’ to stop nuclear program
- ‘Black Santa’ display at IU sparks student outrage
FEC mulls contributions via text
Same technology used in giving to charities
Americans, already using their cell phones to make charitable contributions or vote for favorite contestants on television shows such as “Dancing With the Stars,” soon could be dialing in campaign contributions to their favorite members of Congress.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is expected to rule within weeks on a bid by the wireless industry to allow small political donations through text messages, potentially opening up a whole new source of cash for politicians and fundraisers.
The plan is proposed by CTIA - The Wireless Association, a powerful Washington trade group, which manages the system of five- and six-digit numbers leased by third-party entities to communicate with and raise money from cell-phone customers.
The donations would be capped at $10 each, according to FEC filings. The group says the proposal would work similarly to how cell-phone users can now make charitable contributions. In the aftermath of the January earthquake in Haiti, for example, the Red Cross raised millions of dollars through text messaging.
But whether the same technology could, or should, belong in politics isn’t yet clear.
The FEC issued a staff report raising concerns about the idea last month, saying in part that the plan could commingle corporate funds and political contributions, which isn’t allowed under federal campaign law.
Caleb P. Burns, a lawyer with Wiley Rein, which represents CTIA, said he spoke for about an hour at a hearing before the FEC commissioners earlier this month to address issues in the staff report. CTIA also agreed to extend a deadline by the FEC to rule on the request until Nov. 22.
Mr. Burns said some of the FEC commissioners expressed an interest in approving portions of the plan, and he was hopeful the final FEC ruling would be more permissive than what the FEC staff originally recommended.
Campaign-finance expert Arn Pearson of Common Cause, a nonpartisan watchdog group, called the idea “intriguing” and said the proposal could help expand the influence of small donors in elections. But he also said he would want assurances that the wireless industry, already a major lobbying force on Capitol Hill, wouldn’t be in a position to back one candidate or cause over another.
“They’re active political players and spend a lot of money to influence elections,” Mr. Pearson said. “I can’t help but worry that there’s not some angle that’s not visible on paper.”
When forwarding contributions to political campaigns, the wireless-service providers would follow the same standard business practices used in collecting and forwarding funds being used for other purposes, CTIA said.
While wireless providers wouldn’t forward donors names to campaigns, CTIA said text messages could be sent to the donors to certify their donations comply with federal law.
The text message would include questions to ensure that donors are making the contributions on their own behalf, that they are not foreign nationals and that the text message donations won’t exceed $50 to each recipient per calendar year. Under FEC rules, anonymous contributions are limited to $50.
Fundraisers and candidates across the political spectrum are anticipating the ruling.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Last call: State Dept. bought $180,000 in liquor before shutdown
- Federal prosecutors drop charges against defendants who disappeared
- Bankrupt energy company probed
- Wage nominee at Labor also works for AFL-CIO
- Former Time editor Stengel got big bonus while laying off reporters, heading to State Department
Latest Blog Entries
By Tom Harris and Madhav Khandekar
Bad science puts rich nations on the hook for trillions in climate liabilities
- Angry NTSB ousts railroad union from N.Y. train crash site
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Puerto Rico caravan honoring Paul Walker ends in 6 drunken-driving arrests, 72 speeding tickets
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- Xbox One, Playstation 4 games penalize users for cursing in their own homes
- First Dog Sunny knocks down Ashtyn Gardner; Michelle Obama yanks leash
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- Allen West warns Obamas backdoor gun control is moving forward
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.