- Al Sharpton, Trayvon Martin’s parents rally against Fla. ‘stand your ground’ law
- Hillary Clinton campaign got illicit funds from D.C. scandal figure
- Obama administration backs off plan to cut prescription-drug program
- Tickets linked to stolen passports purchased by Iranian middleman
- More than 3,500 police planned for Boston Marathon
- Ottawa day care suspends 2-year-old for ‘outside’ cheese sandwich
- Liam Neeson tells NYC mayor to ‘man up’ in horse carriage fight
- Real-life Dr. Doolittle to reveal how to talk to animals
- Climate change could bring back smallpox, researchers say
- Shoe-bomb witness to speak from London at N.Y. trial
Poets buzzed about for Nobel literature prize
South Korean poet Ko Un and Syria’s Adonis are generating the most buzz among Swedish Nobel watchers, while betting agencies are giving lower odds to Ngugi wa Thiong’o of Kenya and American novelist Cormac McCarthy.
The secretive academy doesn’t give any hints. All permanent secretary Peter Englund would say is that the 16-member panel had already selected a winner last week, though the formal vote would be made on Thursday.
Five Europeans and one Turk have received the prestigious 10 million kronor ($1.5 million) prize in the past six years. All were primarily novelists except playwright Harold Pinter, who won in 2005.
The Swedish Academy has been criticized for being too Euro-centric, ignoring writers from other parts of the world. Englund’s predecessor Horace Engdahl sparked outrage in U.S. literature circles two years ago when he dismissed American writers as “too sensitive to trends in their own mass culture.”
It has also been accused of having a political bias, favoring left-leaning writers, which Englund rejected.
“I would say that the academy in its work is free of political bias,” he told The Associated Press in an interview last week. “I would say also that that is not possible because you can find very different political views inside the academy.”
Literature expert Maria Schottenius at Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter, who correctly predicted last year’s winner Herta Mueller of Germany, said she believes it will be Ko or Adonis this year, with songwriter Bob Dylan as an outsider.
Ko is “the kind of person who is trying to unite his divided country with poetry and he writes about everything he encounters, all the people, stones, plants and animals,” she said.
Swedish national broadcaster SVT also pointed to Ko and Adonis as potential winners, with Algeria’s Assia Djebar and Canadian writer Alice Munro among its other top candidates.
A wild card could be Thiong’o who topped betting site Unibet’s list. The Kenyan writer, known for his provocative satire about postcolonial Africa, visited Sweden’s biggest book fair last month. Another betting site, Ladbrokes, gave the lowest odds on its list of potential winners to McCarthy, author of best-selling books “The Road” and “No Country for Old Men.”
Other writers that figure frequently in Nobel speculation include Americans Philip Roth, Joyce Carol Oates and Thomas Pynchon, Israel’s Amos Oz and Claudio Magris of Italy.
Englund declined to name the prizes that he believed went wrong, but said it was a mistake to not give the prize to Danish author Karen Blixen, also known by her pen name, Isak Dinesen, wrote “Out of Africa” about her life in Kenya in the early 1930’s.
TWT Video Picks
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- Mitch McConnell on beating tea party: 'We are going to crush them'
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again