Brown’s lawsuit puts Bell’s city attorney in tough spot

California Attorney General Jerry Brown filed suit Wednesday against former and current city officials in the Los Angeles suburb of Bell who collected bloated salaries - a move that places recently appointed city attorney James M. Casso in a position to both defend and prosecute those same officials.

But Mr. Casso’s own past, which includes close ties to Bell city officials, questionable service to other municipal clients and involvement in a Clinton-era political scandal, raises questions about whether he is suited to restore the public’s trust.

He was hired last month based on what city officials described as “his extensive experience, expertise as a city attorney and his outstanding reputation as a community leader.”

On Sept. 3, the city council - whose members also collected inflated salaries and still hold power - unanimously voted to authorize him to investigate and prosecute any actions that led to the salary crisis.

Now in the wake of Mr. Brown’s lawsuit, which asks the court to appoint a receiver and seeks the return of any excessive compensation and a reduction in city officials’ pension benefits, Mr. Casso could also be put into the role of defending many of the targets of the state’s legal action.

Asked about his potential dual role in Bell’s affairs, Mr. Casso said he had not read the attorney general’s lawsuit. He said he could see the benefit of conserving resources and that he would continue to advise his client to cooperate fully with all investigations.

“There’s an interest in getting to the bottom of what is going on,” he said.

Yet his experience includes a number of questionable matters, including his role in a controversial Clinton administration commutation of the sentence of a convicted drug dealer - after the dealer’s father paid first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton’s brother $200,000 to lobby the White House.

According to a 2002 House Committee on Government Reform report, Mr. Casso “emerged as a significant figure” in the effort by Los Angeles businessman Horacio Vignali to free his son Carlos from serving a 15-year prison sentence on a major federal drug trafficking conviction in Minnesota.

The report states that Mr. Casso in 2000 arranged a meeting between Mr. Vignali and Hugh Rodham, Mrs. Clinton’s brother, who received a $200,000 check at the meeting and pressed for the younger Vignali’s commutation in the waning days of the Clinton presidency.

The House Committee report states that during the congressional investigation, Mr. Casso declined to answer questions and later invoked attorney-client privilege based on his relationship with Mr. Vignali.

“This representation was in direct conflict with earlier assurances given by Casso to committee staff, namely that he never represented the Vignalis,” states the report.

Mr. Casso declined to comment on the Vignali matter.

But his involvement in the affair is a red flag for government watchdogs who are concerned about Bell’s future.

“His failure to cooperate with a legal body raises a cloud of suspicion,” said Jaime A. Regalado, director of the Edmund G. “Pat” Brown Institute of Public Affairs.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks