- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Bid to curb campaign donors challenged
GOP, business groups call Obama’s contractor disclosure plan one-sided
Question of the Day
President Obama’s planto require government contractors to disclose campaign contributions is receiving a rocky reception from Republicans and even some advocates of transparency.
GOP lawmakers have joined the nation’s leading business groups in condemning the move as a federal overreach and a backdoor way to hinder Republican fundraising efforts — and punish the corporations that support them.
Many transparency groups say it’s a step in the right direction, but they aren’t satisfied because Mr. Obama’s plan doesn’t go far enough.
“The White House has floated a trial balloon to see what the political response would be,” said John Samples, director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute. He thinks the president is willing to consider changes.
Campaign-finance rules altered course in January 2010, when the Supreme Court opened the door for corporations and unions to contribute “independent spending” to the election process. That might include paying for a television commercial that favors, but is not endorsed by, a candidate.
Later that year, Democrats in the House and Senate introduced the Disclose Act, which would have limited the effect of the court’s ruling by restricting government contractors and corporations with certain levels of foreign management or ownership from “independent spending.” Other companies would be allowed to use “independent spending” to support a campaign, but would be subject to transparency regulations. Congress never passed it.
Now, it is “coming back on the president’s will alone,” Mr. Samples said. In its present form, the draft executive order would require government agencies to collect political-contribution information from contractors but not prevent them from donating.
Republicans and business groups say it isn’t about transparency. They fear the party in charge of the White House at the time will make it more difficult for certain companies to win federal contracts.
“You have to think about politics as a war,” Mr. Samples said. “This campaign-finance regulation in general is really about taking ammunition away from the other side.”
On Tuesday, 25 congressional Republicans, including Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, wrote a letter to the president addressing those concerns.
“Political activity would obviously be threatened if the causes they support are disfavored by the Administration,” they said. “No White House should be able to review your political party affiliation or the causes you support before deciding if you are worthy of a government contract. And no Americans should have to worry about whether their political activities or support will affect their ability to get or keep a federal contract or their job.”
The Business Roundtable, a group of CEOs, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce would also like the president rethink his strategy.
It might be difficult for the president to make friends on this issue, Mr. Samples indicated, because some transparency groups will see this as a “sellout.”
“The executive order is weaker than the Disclose Act,” Mr. Samples said. “It’s possible that their coalition could see it as an ineffective response. If everyone’s going to be against it, including their allies, then it’s pointless.”
The Project on Government Oversight, which has not yet taken sides on the executive order, is in favor of more transparency in the campaign process. But the group admits there are “holes” in the president’s plan that “raise some questions.” They would rather see it extended beyond contractors.
“I think what the president’s executive order would do is just take a piece of that,” POGO spokesman Joe Newman explained. “It’s just going to address a small part of the problem with the lack of transparency and political giving.”
Other transparency groups are ready to support the president’s plan. Public Citizen is “quite delighted,” but even it would like government contractors banned from contributing altogether.
“The president is doing what the president can,” said Craig Holman, government-affairs lobbyist at Public Citizen.
Gary Bass, executive director at OMB Watch, is just happy that something is being done to “get money out of politics.” He realizes it would be asking too much for the president to make any more changes to the plan.
“If he were king for a day, that’s what he would do,” Mr. Bass said. “The problem is, he isn’t king.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- MAY: Barbarians at Jordan's gate
- Outrage over $190M border security deal for troubled federal contractor
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq