- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
U.S. investors likely to help new regimes in oil countries
North Africa and Mideast are used to strife
Question of the Day
As political unrest and violence continue to flare across the Middle East, the U.S. capital is seeking its own oases in the desert.
Hotels, restaurants, and tourist-oriented transportation industries in countries that have thus far avoided major unrest — the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, and Oman — are either thriving or expected to pick up new business in the near future. The oil industry in Persian Gulf countries such as Kuwait, UAE and Qatar are also likely to benefit as production is curtailed in other countries.
“Some of these markets and cities are doing incredibly well,” said Jonathan Worsley, spokesman for the Arabian Hotel Investment Conference. “You’re either in the thick of things, or you’re doing well by not being in it.”
But for major U.S. companies doing business in such long-established markets as Egypt and Tunisia, the future is far more uncertain. Old relationships have crumbled with old regimes, and much uncertainty hangs over economic policy as the new governments struggle to get organized.
Business groups say the turmoil is the Middle East and North Africa is nothing new for American companies operating there.
The region has long suffered from political and civil unrest that undercut their bottom lines. But veteran U.S. investors say they knew the risks they were taking when they went in. Most American investors plan to stay the course and help rebuild the economies under new regimes, according to Lionel Johnson, vice president of Middle East and North Africa affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
“The U.S. companies that are there have been there for a long time, they’re planning to be there in the future, and they’re trying to do everything they can to help,” Mr. Johnson said. “You’re not seeing disinvestment. You’re not seeing companies shutting their doors and pulling out operations. They’re continuing to be there.”
There are few U.S. companies in Libya, said Mohsin Khan, a senior fellow at the District-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, lessening the impact on American business investment there. American businesses have faced more difficulties in Egypt, where longtime U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak was driven from power by a popular revolt less than two months ago.
Some had to close at the height of the unrest. Kraft Foods, which has operations across the Middle East, was forced to suspend operations in Egypt and Bahrain for several days, but has since reopened its facilities.
The new regime in Egypt and those in other countries throughout the region could turn a cold shoulder to foreign businesses that flourished under the previous rulers, Mr. Khan warned. That could mean price controls that would cut into profits. U.S. producers like Kellogg’s and Coca-Cola are among those who could be at risk.
“If you’re in that business, your prices could be controlled,” Mr. Khan said. “The profits there will be reduced. That, to me, is a serious risk.”
A more pressing concern for Mr. Khan is whether these countries will blame foreign businesses for their struggles. Western analysts say Mr. Mubarak made a major move to overhaul the country’s lagging economy in 2004, appointing a slate of reform-minded ministers to key economic, tax, labor and trade posts.
More insular, protectionist regimes could turn to tariffs and other barriers to trade as a way to protect local producers.
In recent years, economies across the Middle East were taking steps in the right direction, Mr. Khan added, but they could spiral backward.
Egypt, for example, once ranked near the bottom of the World Bank’s list of 183 nations with business-friendly climates. But it had surged to No. 94 in the 2011 survey, before the fall of the Mubarak government.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Sarah Palin's online channel hits snag as Stephen Colbert buys similar URL
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world