- Pope Francis, huge crowd joyously celebrate Easter
- Transcript reveals confusion over ferry evacuation in South Korea
- Militants kill 14 Algerian soldiers in ambush
- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
Alabama latest state to impose abortion restrictions
Legislators cited evidence that fetus feels pain
Alabama on Thursday officially became the fifth state in the nation to restrict abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, the latest in a wave of new state efforts to curb the practice this year.
“It’s just great to have a law on the books. … It’s a great moral victory as well as legal,” said Rev. James Henderson, director of the Alabama Alliance Against Abortion.
The Alabama statute relies on what supporters say is scientifically-based evidence that fetuses can feel pain at that stage of life, and tracks a similar measure approved in Nebraska last year.
“When the first law on this passed in Nebraska, the impact was almost immediate: The abortionist who performed abortions on pain-capable children stopped doing them,” said Mary Spaulding Balch, director of state legislation at the National Right to Life Committee. “I think it will have a similar impact in the state of Alabama.”
But pro-choice organizations question the science behind fetal pain, and already an Idaho woman has filed a class-action lawsuit against that state’s law.
“Fetal pain” laws - which are also newly in effect in Kansas and Oklahoma - are among an unprecedented 83 laws passed this year to regulate and curb abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
The 2010 elections brought in as many as 600 new pro-life state legislators, according to Americans United for Life, and activists have seized the chance to capitalize on their strength. One priority is to “detach any taxpayer money from abortion services,” said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List.
Pro-choice groups condemn the spate of new laws as hostile to women’s reproductive rights and have taken many states to court. The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) said it is “now carrying the largest active caseload in its history,” and has filed lawsuits against “some of the most heinous laws enacted this session.”
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the family planning organization that is the nation’s largest provider of abortion services, and the American Civil Liberties Union have also joined many of the lawsuits as well.
Idaho’s new fetal-pain law is being challenged by Jennie Linn McCormack, a mother of three who used RU-486 drugs she obtained online to terminate a second-trimester pregnancy earlier this year.
Ms. McCormack was prosecuted for violating a 1972 law, but had her case dismissed for lack of evidence. She has since filed a class-action lawsuit against the 1972 law and the new fetal-pain law, saying both laws pose unconstitutional barriers to women’s right to abortion. A hearing is set for Sept. 8.
Among the lawsuits filed by pro-choice organizations:
• In Indiana, Planned Parenthood is challenging sections of an abortion bill that deny Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood and require new counseling for women considering an abortion. U.S. District Court Tanya Walton Pratt ruled in favor of a temporary injunction of the law; the case is on appeal to 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
• In Kansas, U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten ruled that a new budget provision that blocks funds to Planned Parenthood was unconstitutional. The Kansas attorney general’s office filed an appeal in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. A judge ruled Aug. 30 that the state must continue to pay Planned Parenthood for now.
• In North Carolina, a budget law, enacted over the Democratic governor’s veto, specifically prohibits Planned Parenthood from receiving funds from the state. Planned Parenthood sued and is awaiting a decision from U.S. District Court Judge James A. Beaty Jr. The state must pay Planned Parenthood in the meantime, the judge said last month.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Judge voids N. Dakota's 'heartbeat' abortion law
- Family, agency in custody battle over sick daughter
- Values group wins court round over use of gay marriage photo
- Gay-photo lawsuit partially dismissed
- Some gay activists fear same-sex supporters are becoming intolerant
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CHARLES: Holder's undermining of the law deserving of contempt
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.