- Oregonians flee in face of fast-moving wildfire as homes go up in blaze
- Eric Holder: ‘Racial animus’ fuels opposition to Obama and me
- Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl to return to active duty at Fort Sam Houston
- Israel says it’s downed drone along southern coast
- Despite offensive, Gaza rockets still hit Israel
- Extra-time goal gives Germany World Cup title over Argentina
- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
Supreme Court to hear health care suit in March
Question of the Day
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to the Affordable Care Act in late March - nailing down at least one absolute for the controversial health care overhaul that has been mired in a tug of war between critics looking to dismantle “Obamacare” and supporters fighting to protect the president’s signature legislative victory.
The court announced Monday morning the three-day hearing will take place March 26-28.
A few hours later and just down the street, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius unveiled 32 health care providers that have been selected to become Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) - the new models created under the law that are intended to cut costs and improve efficiencies.
But while the administration rolled out another new component of the health care overhaul, Republicans were busy last week taking another run at stripping funds from the act.
Looking for cash to offset the proposed extension of the payroll-tax cut, House Republicans passed a bill that would have cut more than $25 billion from the act by allowing the federal government to reclaim more overpayments of insurance subsidies, cutting a fund for “evidence-based” prevention programs, repealing provisions in the law that hurt physician-owned hospitals and reducing some Medicaid spending.
The effort died in the Senate, but the latest attempt to “starve” the president’s health care overhaul illustrates how the act continues to divide state and federal lawmakers, with both sides anxiously awaiting the Supreme Court ruling.
Last month, the court announced it will take up a lawsuit brought by 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), who have accused Congress of overstepping constitutional boundaries by mandating that individuals must obtain health insurance and requiring states to massively expand expensive Medicaid programs as part of the health care overhaul.
The court will rule on four key questions: whether the individual mandates are constitutional, whether the Medicaid expansions are constitutional, whether challenges to the law are premature under a provision known as the Anti-injunction Act and whether overturning the individual mandate would topple the entire law.
The justices have scheduled arguments on the Anti-injunction Act for March 26 and arguments on the individual mandate for March 27. On the final day of oral arguments, March 28, they will hear arguments pertaining to the Medicaid expansion and whether the rest of the law can stand without the individual mandate.
While the court usually allots far less time for oral arguments, the fact that it has scheduled three days for the health care lawsuit indicates the intense legal debate and high political stakes at play.
The hearing will take place a few days after the second anniversary of the Affordable Care Act, passed in March 2010.
Justices had their pick of cases from among three appeals courts that have ruled on the merits of the challenges. They chose the case from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which struck down the individual mandate, but upheld other parts of the law, including the state Medicaid expansion.
“We’re really looking forward to arguing this case, and we have all the confidence in the world in our standing in it,” said NFIB spokeswoman Cynthia Magnuson.
In the most recent announcement on Monday, the agency named 32 health care providers it had selected from among 160 applicants, allowing them to participate in a pilot program to test whether using new payment models can cut costs for Medicare. The providers will try to save money by encouraging doctors, hospitals and specialists to better coordinate patient care and thereby cut down on hospital readmissions, emergency-room visits and other expensive services.
Officials estimate the pilot ACOs could save Medicare $1.1 billion over five years. Organizations that do succeed in improving the health of patients and cutting costs will be able to move away from using Medicare’s traditional fee-for-service model and instead use a model based on the level of service provided.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- A familiar fading feeling for McMahon in Connecticut
- Romney’s bid to undo health law faces hurdles
- Hill GOP presses Medicare probe
- Outsiders abide by rules in Brown-Warren race
- Iran talks not set up, Obama’s camp says
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
- DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama
- Agency scrubs Malia Obama photos at White House's request: report
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Emeryville, Calif., police chief: Guns aren't for defense
- Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi formerly a U.S. captive
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?
- Germany wins World Cup title on Mario Goetze goal in extra time
- Obama's 'blank check' rejected as border solution
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs