- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
Short-term spending measure likely to be passed
Question of the Day
Congress is nearing passage of a short-term spending bill to keep the government from shutting down at the end of this week, but the deal does little to resolve the long-term fight over spending for the rest of 2011 and beyond.
The House is slated to vote Tuesday on a bill to push until March 18 the shutdown deadline while cutting $4 billion from 2010 spending levels. The Senate will then take up the bill, and Congress must finalize a version before midnight Friday.
At stake is the first major set of Republican cuts after November’s elections, which the GOP says handed it a mandate, along with control of the House and higher numbers in the Senate.
“Democrat leaders in Congress resisted even this up until a few days ago. Now, they have started to suggest they might be willing to agree to it. This is progress,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican. “This week, Democrats will have an opportunity to show that they’ve gotten the message.”
The short-term approach seemed to win the White House’s approval Monday, with press secretary Jay Carney saying it is “moving in the right direction.”
Congressional Democrats have been divided, however, with some saying they can accept the short-term bill’s cuts while others seemed to rule out any cuts right now.
Still to be seen is whether the short-term “continuing resolution” can blossom into a full bill to fund the government through Sept. 30 — the end of fiscal year 2011.
The House approved a spending bill at $61 billion below 2010 levels, but President Obama and Senate Democratic leaders said the measure is unacceptable. They have not countered with cuts of their own, but if the two sides can’t reach agreement, House Republicans raised the possibility of cutting week by week.
“If we keep cutting $4 billion every two weeks until the end of the fiscal year, Sept. 30, that’ll equal $60 billion in cuts that we’ve asked for in the House and I think that’s a good deal,” Rep. Patrick McHenry, North Carolina Republican, told “America’s Morning News” radio program on Monday.
Democrats, though, say that’s not the way to budget.
“Honestly, I think this two-week business is not the way to go. I think there should be a longer-term agreement, hopefully through the end of the year,” Sen. Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, told CNN’s “State of the Union” program Sunday.
By historic standards, the number of interim resolutions for this fiscal year — this week’s would be the fifth extension — is actually pretty low. In 2000, Congress passed 21 interim extensions, including 10 in one 10-day period near that year’s presidential election.
Meanwhile, both sides sparred over the effects Republicans’ broad spending cuts would have on the economy.
On Monday, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, wrote a memo arguing that cutting spending at the levels Republicans have proposed could cost 700,000 jobs by the end of 2012.
“While cuts and tax increases are necessary to address the nation’s long-term fiscal problems, cutting too deeply before the economy is in full expansion would add unnecessary risk,” Mr. Zandi wrote, echoing a memo last week from a Goldman Sachs analyst who said cuts could cost 800,000 jobs.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq