A 1996 federal marriage law is unconstitutional and should be repealed, Sen. Dianne Feinstein told a news conference that featured gay couples who have insurance, visa and legal problems because of the law.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing Wednesday on a bill that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and “ensure respect for state regulation of marriage.”
In March, Mrs. Feinstein and several Democratic colleagues introduced the Respect for Marriage Act, which strikes the DOMA language and says that for purposes of federal law, “an individual shall be considered married if that individual’s marriage is valid” where it was obtained.
Mrs. Feinstein pledged to keep fighting for her bill. “We’re in this for the long march, not just the short hop,” she said Tuesday.
However, Ed Whelan of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, who is scheduled to testify Wednesday in defense of DOMA, said Mrs. Feinstein’s bill would “pave the way for polygamous and other polyamorous unions.”
Without DOMA’s definition of marriage, the arguments for same-sex marriage will be applied in those cases too, Mr. Whelan said on National Review Online. Mrs. Feinstein’s bill would not respect marriage, but would instead “empty the term of any core content,” he added.
Rick Jacobs, founder of Courage Campaign, and three gay couples spoke at Tuesday’s press conference.
DOMA allows any state or territory to “disrespect my marriage,” said Kathleen Cumiskey of Staten Island, N.Y. She and wife Robin Garber carry a box of documents “everywhere” to prove that they have a legal relationship.
Hunter College professor Robert Koehl and Stylianos Manolakakis said DOMA creates visa problems for their 15-year relationship, and federal employee Beth Vorro said DOMA forces her psychotherapist-wife Beth Coderre to get private health insurance because she cannot be added to a federal health policy.
“I think, as Rosa Parks might say, it’s time to get up from the back of the bus and assume our seats among the rest of our fellow human beings,” Mrs. Coderre said.
DOMA passed Congress with strong bipartisan support and was signed into law by President Clinton. It defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also tells states they do not have to recognize out-of-state same-sex unions.
DOMA arose amid credible concerns that one state court would effectively change marriage laws in all 50 states. In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that, under nondiscrimination law, the state could no longer deny gay couples marriage licenses. The high court sent the case back to a lower court for further action.
This landmark court decision raised the likelihood of gay marriage being legalized in Hawaii — as well as questions about the national implications of gay couples traveling to Hawaii, getting married and seeking legal recognition of their marriages back home.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor. Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Paul Rondeau dissects the propaganda, media tricks, and other shenanigans targeting our families, faith, and freedom…and even life itself
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention